[2017] KEELC 3655 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3655 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiffs are the registered proprietors of the suit properties and are entitled to quiet and peaceful possession until their titles are lawfully cancelled. The Defendants did not demonstrate any legal interest in the suit properties, and their allegations regarding the public access road...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3655 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lodovico Gentile; Plaintiff: Ellen Altmeier Gentile; Defendant: Sara Centofanti; Defendant: Bilal Chaudri
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 193 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
Application for temporary injunction allowed.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Trespass, Quiet Possession, Public Access Roads
Source Language
en
Land and Property Temporary Injunctions Trespass Quiet Possession Public Access Roads

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lodovico Gentile

Plaintiff

Ellen Altmeier Gentile

Plaintiff

Sara Centofanti

Defendant

Bilal Chaudri

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to temporary injunctive orders restraining the Defendants from interfering with parcels L.R. No. 624/56 and 624/57 pending determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to orders for removal of a wall and restoration of public access to the beach and Angel Bay Estate.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiffs have established a prima facie case with a probability of success.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiffs are the registered proprietors of the suit properties and are entitled to quiet and peaceful possession until their titles are lawfully cancelled. The Defendants did not demonstrate any legal interest in the suit properties, and their allegations regarding the public access road require determination at trial. The Plaintiffs established a prima facie case for the grant of temporary injunctive relief. Accordingly, the court allowed the Plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction as prayed, pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.

Court Disposition

Application for temporary injunction allowed.

Orders

  • Temporary injunction issued restraining the Defendants, their servants, agents, or employees from entering, trespassing, encroaching, demolishing, destroying, damaging, wasting, constructing on, or interfering with L.R. No. 624/56 and 624/57 pending hearing and determination of the main suit.
  • Defendants directed to open up access road to the public beach and Angel Bay Estate.