[2006] KEHC 2190 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 2190 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities by demonstrating continuous possession of the suit land since 1975, production of a share certificate and payment receipt, and evidence of allocation by the land buying company. The defendants did not contest the claim or provide...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 2190 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Loghan Njenga Waweru; Defendant: Damaris Muga Kamure; Defendant: Land Registrar – Nakuru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 240 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment After Formal Proof; Default Judgment Entered
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
FI Koome
Legal Topics
Land Ownership, Title Cancellation, Fraudulent Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Ownership Title Cancellation Fraudulent Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Loghan Njenga Waweru

Plaintiff

Damaris Muga Kamure

Defendant

Land Registrar – Nakuru

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment After Formal Proof; Default Judgment Entered

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the rightful owner of Molo South/Langwenda Block 12/423 (Marwa).
  2. 2 Whether the title deed issued to the 1st defendant was obtained fraudulently and should be cancelled.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of ownership and issuance of title.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities by demonstrating continuous possession of the suit land since 1975, production of a share certificate and payment receipt, and evidence of allocation by the land buying company. The defendants did not contest the claim or provide any evidence to the contrary. The court held that the title deed issued to the 1st defendant was irregularly and fraudulently obtained, and that the plaintiff was entitled to a declaration of ownership and cancellation of the 1st defendant's title. The Land Registrar was ordered to cancel the irregular title and issue a proper title to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Declaration that property known as Molo South/Langwenda Block 12/423 (Marwa) is the property of the plaintiff.
  • The Land Registrar (2nd defendant) is compelled to cancel the title irregularly issued to the 1st defendant and issue the plaintiff with the same title.