[2006] KEHC 1178 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, through unchallenged evidence, that he was the original allottee of the suit property by M/s Ndeffo Company Ltd, supported by a share certificate and payment receipt. The plaintiff has been in uninterrupted occupation since allocation. The records showing the 1st...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1178 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Loghan Njenga Waweru; Defendant: Joseph Kamau; Defendant: Land Registrar – Nakuru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 241 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Formal Proof Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment_for_plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Land Allocation Disputes, Title Cancellation, Fraudulent Registration
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Loghan Njenga Waweru
Plaintiff
Joseph Kamau
Defendant
Land Registrar – Nakuru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Formal Proof Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the rightful allottee and owner of MOLO SOUTH/LANGWENDA BLOCK 12/424 (MARWA).
- 2 Whether the title issued to the 1st defendant was obtained fraudulently and should be cancelled.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of ownership and issuance of title.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, through unchallenged evidence, that he was the original allottee of the suit property by M/s Ndeffo Company Ltd, supported by a share certificate and payment receipt. The plaintiff has been in uninterrupted occupation since allocation. The records showing the 1st defendant as owner were not explained, and the 1st defendant never made a claim or appeared in court. The court concluded that the title issued to the 1st defendant was obtained fraudulently or erroneously. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of ownership, cancellation of the 1st defendant's title, and issuance of a new title in the plaintiff's name.
Court Disposition
judgment_for_plaintiff
Orders
- A declaration that MOLO SOUTH/LANGWENDA BLOCK 12/424 (MARWA) is the property of the plaintiff.
- The title issued to the 1st defendant is cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
Civil Case 241 of 2005
LOGHAN NJENGA WAWERU……...................…………………………..PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOSEPH KAMAU……………………..................………………..…1ST DEFENDANT
LAND REGISTRAR – NAKURU…......................…………….…..2ND DEFENDANT
JUDGEMENT
This matter proceeded for hearing by way of Formal Proof. The plaintiff Loghan Njenga Waweru instituted this suit by way of a plaint on 29th September, 2005 against Joseph Kamau and the Land Registrar – Nakuru. Although the defendants were duly served they failed to enter appearance and file a defence and therefore judgement was entered for the plaintiff and the matter proceeded for formal proof.
During the hearing, the plaintiff gave evidence in support of his claim in respect of land known as MOLO SOUTH/LANGWENDA BLOCK 12/424(MARWA).
According to the plaintiff the above land was allotted to him by M/s Ndeffo Company. The said Company was the original owner and registered proprietor of the above suit premises. The plaintiff produced the Share Certificate No. 3969 which was issued to him on the 17th April, 1975 and a payment receipt.
The Share Certificate indicates that the plaintiff was allocated Plot No. 424. Subsequently the plaintiff settled on the plot but he was not issued with a Title Deed. He said he has been in uninterrupted occupation since the plot was allocated to him. However the records at Lands Office indicates that the plot was allocated to one Joseph Kamau as per the Search Certificate dated 12th September, 2005. The plaintiff confirmed that this person indicated as the owner of the plot has never made a claim over the land and thus in his opinion the Title was issued to the first defendant fraudulently.
Despite having been served the said defendants have never entered appearance and no defence has been filed. Thus the plaintiff urged this Court to grant the orders sought in the plaint.
I have carefully considered the evidence by the plaintiff which was not at all challenged. I am satisfied that the plaintiff has been able to prove his claim to the required standard that he was the allottee of the plot No. 424 by M/s Ndeffo Company Ltd. He has been in occupation without any interruption. Accordingly I enter Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed by way of
a) A declaration that the subject property MOLOSOUTH/LANGWENDA BLOCK 12/424 (MARWA) is the property of the plaintiff.
The Title issued to the 1st defendant be cancelled and another title to be issued to the plaintiff.
Costs of this suit to the plaintiff as against the defendants.
It is so ordered.
Judgement read and signed on 9th day of August, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE
9. 8.2006
Before: M. Koome – Judge
Oumo for the plaintiff
Non appearance by defendant
Judgement read and signed on 9th day of August, 2006.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE
9. 8.2006