[2008] KEHC 2381 (KLR)

[2008] KEHC 2381 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff, as administratrix of the deceased's estate, had proved on a balance of probabilities that the deceased was the registered proprietor of the suit land and that the defendant had no legal basis for his continued occupation or trespass. The defendant's prior conviction for forcible...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] KEHC 2381 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Loice Kemunto Mogire (suing on behalf of the estate of David Mogire Omwega); Defendant: James Kerindi Omwega
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 40 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed. Permanent injunction granted against the defendant. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Trespass, Forcible Detainer, Permanent Injunction
Source Language
english
Land and Property Trespass Forcible Detainer Permanent Injunction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Loice Kemunto Mogire (suing on behalf of the estate of David Mogire Omwega)

Plaintiff

James Kerindi Omwega

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant unlawfully trespassed upon the suit land registered as BASSI/BOSANSA/1561.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing on the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff, as administratrix of the deceased's estate, had proved on a balance of probabilities that the deceased was the registered proprietor of the suit land and that the defendant had no legal basis for his continued occupation or trespass. The defendant's prior conviction for forcible detainer further supported the plaintiff's claim. The absence of any defence or contrary evidence from the defendant left the plaintiff's case unchallenged. The court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing upon the suit land and awarded costs to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Permanent injunction granted against the defendant. Costs awarded to the plaintiff.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction is hereby issued restraining the defendant, his servants, workers and/or agents from trespassing upon land parcel BASSI/BOSANSA/1561.
  • The defendant shall bear the costs of this suit.