https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3694

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3694

Although costs ordinarily follow the event, the court found legitimate reasons to depart from that rule because the suit was withdrawn after an amicable settlement tied to mediation in the parties’ succession dispute, none of the parties proved vexatious or frivolous conduct, and the defendants had benefited from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 3694 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lois Holdings Limited (Suing Through its Director Pamela Karambu Kimbui); 1st Defendant: Douglas Gituma Kimbui; 2nd Defendant: Robert Chelabit; 3rd Defendant: Edward Kipngetich; 4th Defendant: Andrew Trikoi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case E010 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Civil Suit / Ruling on Costs After Notice of Withdrawal of Suit
Outcome
Suit withdrawn; costs not awarded to any party
Judges
["CK Nzili"]
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Suit, Costs, Section 27 Civil Procedure Act, Order 25 Civil Procedure Rules, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Settlement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Environment and Land Law Withdrawal of Suit Costs Section 27 Civil Procedure Act Order 25 Civil Procedure Rules Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lois Holdings Limited (Suing Through its Director Pamela Karambu Kimbui)

Plaintiff

Douglas Gituma Kimbui

1st Defendant

Robert Chelabit

2nd Defendant

Edward Kipngetich

3rd Defendant

Andrew Trikoi

4th Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Civil Suit / Ruling on Costs After Notice of Withdrawal of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff’s withdrawal of the suit entitled the defendants to costs
  2. 2 Whether there were legitimate reasons to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event

Ratio Decidendi

Although costs ordinarily follow the event, the court found legitimate reasons to depart from that rule because the suit was withdrawn after an amicable settlement tied to mediation in the parties’ succession dispute, none of the parties proved vexatious or frivolous conduct, and the defendants had benefited from the settlement. Each party was therefore left to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

Suit withdrawn; costs not awarded to any party

Orders

  • Each party shall bear its own costs.