[2001] KEHC 179 (KLR)
The court found that the defendant admitted the occurrence of the accident as pleaded by the plaintiff, and there was no evidence adduced by the defendant to show that the plaintiff was negligent or contributed to the accident. The plaintiff's account that she was on the pavement when knocked down was accepted. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 179 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Loise Nyambeki Oyugi; Defendant: Omar Haji Hassan
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 4150 of 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff awarded general damages for pain and suffering; special damages claim dismissed; costs and interest awarded to plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Motor Vehicle Accident, Personal Injury, Negligence, Quantum of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Loise Nyambeki Oyugi
Plaintiff
Omar Haji Hassan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accident occurred due to the negligent driving of the defendant.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff contributed to the accident through her own negligence.
- 3 What is the appropriate quantum of damages for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the defendant admitted the occurrence of the accident as pleaded by the plaintiff, and there was no evidence adduced by the defendant to show that the plaintiff was negligent or contributed to the accident. The plaintiff's account that she was on the pavement when knocked down was accepted. The court determined that the injuries sustained were minor soft tissue injuries, as both parties agreed and there was no evidence of hospital admission or loss of consciousness. The court awarded Ksh. 20,000 for pain and suffering, as suggested by the defendant's advocate, and dismissed the claim for special damages due to lack of proof. Costs and interest were awarded to the...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff awarded general damages for pain and suffering; special damages claim dismissed; costs and interest awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- The defendant is found 100% liable for the accident.
- The plaintiff is awarded Ksh. 20,000 as general damages for pain and suffering.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
1. Motor vehicle accident 2. Pedestrian 3. Injuries 4. Quantum 5. Special Damages
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO. 4150 OF 1991
LOISE NYAMBEKI OYUGI ...................................... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
OMAR HAJI HASSAN ............................................. DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
The plaintiff narrated how she was standing at a pavement with the intention of crossing the road when there came a vehicle that knocked her down.
She was injured on her hand (indicated her left elbow). She stated she was rushed to hospital.
She sued the defendants in tort and prayed that she be awarded damages. The advocate for the plaintiff stated that an award of Ksh. 150,000/- be awarded as per the case law of James
Gichuru Kamau
v.
Joseph Muambi HCCC
596/87 unreported.
The advocate for the defendant stated that no award be given as liability had not been proved. That the plaintiff if awarded be given Ksh. 20,000/-.
In his case law of Simon v. Jones M. Ithau HCCC 2462/87. The high court awarded Ksh. 400,000/- for bruises on cheeks, hip and bones. That the amount was less 40% as to liability.
I have before me agreed issues:-
Whether the accident occurred by the negligent driving of the defendant?
The defendant in his para 3 of the defence admits “that an accident occurred on the date and place specified in the plaint”.
The advocate for the defendant submitted at length that the plaintiff did not ever know the vehicle that knocked her nor saw the defendant?. That was not the issue as the defendant admits that the accident occurred as stated in the plaint.
what the major issue is whether the defendant was negligent or was it attributed to the plaintiff’s negligence. The plaintiff stated she was on the pavement and was knocked whilst on the pavement. It is the defendant who alleged that she was walking on the road. No evidence as such was deduced by them. I hereby find that the defendant is liable for this accident at 100%.
As to the quantum before the court, the plaintiff stated she was injured on her hand and included her elbow. The plaint described the injuries as:-
1) Traumatic osteothesis of the elbow
2) Multiple limbs of right elbow.
3) stiffness and pain of left elbow
4) Trauma shock
The advocate for the plaintiff was unable to trace the doctor who examined to attend court.
Nonetheless both advocates admit that the plaintiff sustained soft tissue injuries. The advocate for the defendant stated in his submissions that those injuries were as minor that she was not admitted to hospital. In fact there was no records to show that she had been admitted.
I would agree that the injuries in this case were extremely minor. the plaintiff was in fact able to describe injuries on her right elbow. She did not mention the other elbows. there was nothing in the pleadings to show she lost consciousness.
I would award damages for soft tissue injuries for pain and suffering at Ksh. 20,000/- as resolved by the advocate for the defendant.
I would dismiss the claim of Ksh. 1,100/- of special damages as having not been proved. I award costs of this suit to the plaintiff. I award interest from the date of this judgment to the plaintiff.
Dated this 7th day of February, 2001 at Nairobi.
M. A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE