[2025] KEELRC 1110 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's termination was procedurally and substantively unfair, as the respondent failed to follow the requirements of the Employment Act regarding notice and justification for dismissal. The court applied section 49(1)(c) and (4) of the Employment Act to assess compensation, considering...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELRC 1110 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Evans Barare Momanyi; Respondent: Kenya Kazi Services Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1110 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant.
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Termination, Compensation for Termination, Payment in Lieu of Notice, Unpaid Salaries, Leave Entitlements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evans Barare Momanyi
Applicant
Kenya Kazi Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's termination was unlawful and unfair under the Employment Act.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unlawful termination.
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment in lieu of notice, unpaid salary, and pro rata leave.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's termination was procedurally and substantively unfair, as the respondent failed to follow the requirements of the Employment Act regarding notice and justification for dismissal. The court applied section 49(1)(c) and (4) of the Employment Act to assess compensation, considering the short length of service and the circumstances of termination. The court awarded the claimant two months' salary as compensation for unlawful termination, payment in lieu of notice, unpaid salary for November and December 2014, and pro rata leave. The court also awarded costs and interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant.
Orders
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 21,800 in lieu of one month notice.
- The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 43,600 being unpaid salary for November and December 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Lolmeteti v Kenya Kazi Services Limited (Cause 1110 of 2015) [2025] KEELRC 1110 (KLR) (3 April 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELRC 1110 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause 1110 of 2015
MN Nduma, J
April 3, 2025
Between
Josphat Lolmeteti
Claimant
and
Kenya Kazi Services Limited
Respondent
Judgment
1. Cause No. 1110 of 2015 was heard and determined as a test suit in a judgment dated 16/12/2021. Parties took time to reach settlement on assessment of compensation and payment of terminal benefits in respect of Cause No. 1109, 1736 and 1738 of 2025 but failed. The court proceeds to determine the respective suits on the aforesaid matters arising from same circumstance.
1. Cause No. 1109 of 2025 Nicholas Omari Mokaya 2. The Claimant’s employment ended by a termination letter dated 4/12/2014. At the time of termination, the Claimant was not paid salary for the month of November and December 2014. The Claimant earned Kshs. 17,846/= per month and worked as a Crew Commander from 3/9/2014. The Claimant was not paid in lieu of notice upon termination. The circumstances of termination are similar in all material respects with the test suit except that the Claimant in the test suit worked as a crew commander from the year 2012 upto the date of dismissal on 4/12/2014. The Claimant in this case had served for only three (3) months.
3. Having considered the factors under section 49(1)(c) and (4) of the Employment Act 2007 and the cases cited in the test suit, the court awards the Claimant two (2) months’ salary in compensation in the sum of Kshs. (17,846 x 2) 35,692. 00i.Kshs. 12,846, in lieu of noticeii.Kshs. 17,846. 00 being one-month unpaid salaryiii.Kshs. 4,461 pro rata leave not taken total Kshs. 75,845. 00iv.costs of the suitv.interests at court rates from date of judgment till payment in full.
1736 of 2015 4. In Cause no. 1736 of 2015, the Claimant Evans Barare Momanyi was employed as a crew commander at a monthly salary of Kshs. 21,800. 00 on a date that cannot be ascertained from the pleadings. The Claimant’s employment was terminated in a similar manner and circumstances as in the test suit. The court in assessing the compensation is unable to determine the length of service by the Claimant. The Claimant is, however, owed payment in lieu of leave days not taken and unpaid salary for the month of November and December 2014. The court having considered facts set out under section 49(1)(c) and (4) as set out in the test judgment awards the Claimant the equivalent of two (2) months’ salary in compensation for the unlawful termination in the sum of Kshs. (21,800 x 2) 43,600. 00.
5. In the final analysis judgment is entered in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent as follows:-a.Kshs. 21,800. 00 in lieu of one month noticeb.Kshs. 43,600. 00 being unpaid salary for November and December 2014c.Kshs. 16,350. 00 pro rata leave andd.Kshs. 43,600. 00 being equivalent of two months’ salary in compensationTotal award Kshs. 125,350. 00e.Costs of the suitf.Interest at court rates from date of judgment till payment in full.
1738 of 2015 6. In Cause No. 1738 of 2015 the Claimant Paul Maina Kiarie was dismissed under similar circumstances as the Claimant in the test suit. Considering all factors set out in the test suit, the court awards the Claimant as follows:-a.Kshs. 17,000. 00 in lieu of one-month notice.b.Kshs. 34,000. 00 being unpaid salary for the month of November and December 2014. c.Kshs. 4,250. 00 pro rata leave days not takend.Equivalent of two (2) months’ salary in compensation for the unlawful dismissal the court having not been able to ascertain the length of service of the Claimant from the pleadings in the sum of Kshs. 43,600. 00. Total award Kshs. 98,850. 00e.Costs of the suitf.Interest at court rates from date of judgment till payment in full
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025MATHEWS NDUMAJUDGEAppearance:Mr. Waiganjo for ClaimantMr. Kamau for the RespondentMr. Kemboi – Court Assistant