[2025] KEELC 67 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 67 (KLR)

The court held that the appellants, though belatedly, are entitled to seek leave under Order 42 of the Civil Procedure Rules to file a supplementary record of appeal to include a certified copy of the decree. The omission was not fatal, as the rules permit rectification in the interest of justice, and there was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 67 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Chepotis Kaya Longolereng; Appellant: Moses Keya Lorenga; Respondent: Joyline Cheptoo Limangura; Respondent: Musa Protus Limapus; Respondent: Daniel Katoliki Riponyang
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E015 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to file supplementary record of appeal allowed; costs to respondents.
Judges
CK Nzili
Legal Topics
Appeals Procedure, Supplementary Record, Certified Decree Requirement, Adjournment, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Appeals Procedure Supplementary Record Certified Decree Requirement Adjournment Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chepotis Kaya Longolereng

Appellant

Moses Keya Lorenga

Appellant

Joyline Cheptoo Limangura

Respondent

Musa Protus Limapus

Respondent

Daniel Katoliki Riponyang

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Supplementary Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants should be granted leave to file a supplementary record of appeal to include a certified copy of the decree.
  2. 2 Whether the omission of a certified decree in the record of appeal is fatal to the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents would suffer prejudice if leave is granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the appellants, though belatedly, are entitled to seek leave under Order 42 of the Civil Procedure Rules to file a supplementary record of appeal to include a certified copy of the decree. The omission was not fatal, as the rules permit rectification in the interest of justice, and there was no irreparable prejudice to the respondents that could not be compensated by an award of costs. The court emphasized that procedural rules should be interpreted to facilitate substantive justice, and that mistakes should not bar a party from having their appeal heard on the merits. Accordingly, the appellants were granted leave to file and serve a supplementary record of appeal...

Court Disposition

Application for leave to file supplementary record of appeal allowed; costs to respondents.

Orders

  • Appellants to file and serve a supplementary record of appeal within 7 days to include the certified decree.
  • Costs of Kshs.10,000 awarded to the respondents in any event.