[2024] KEHC 8460 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, a first offender convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm, demonstrated remorse and had significant family responsibilities. The probation officer's report recommended a non-custodial sentence, specifically a community service order, as the applicant was considered suitable...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 8460 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Loperiko; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Lodwar
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E119 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- Sentence revised from custodial to non-custodial; community service order imposed.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Community Service Orders, Non Custodial Sentences, Assault Bodily Harm
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Loperiko
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial sentence imposed on the applicant for assault causing actual bodily harm should be revised to a non-custodial sentence.
- 2 Whether the circumstances of the applicant and the offence justify the imposition of a community service order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, a first offender convicted of assault causing actual bodily harm, demonstrated remorse and had significant family responsibilities. The probation officer's report recommended a non-custodial sentence, specifically a community service order, as the applicant was considered suitable for rehabilitation rather than incarceration. The court held that the offence, being a misdemeanor and the applicant's lack of prior criminal history, justified the imposition of a community service order under the Community Service Orders Act. The court emphasized that non-custodial sentences are appropriate for first offenders who are remorseful and pose no threat to the...
Court Disposition
Sentence revised from custodial to non-custodial; community service order imposed.
Orders
- The custodial sentence is set aside and substituted with a community service order for three months at Kalokol Chief's office.
- The applicant shall undergo professional counselling for anger management as supervised by the probation officer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Loperiko v Republic (Criminal Revision E119 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 8460 (KLR) (11 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8460 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Lodwar
Criminal Revision E119 of 2024
RN Nyakundi, J
July 11, 2024
Between
James Loperiko
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant was charged with the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 251 of the Penal code.
2. The applicant pleaded guilty to the offence and was convicted on his own plea of guilty. As a consequence, he was sentenced to a fine of ten thousand and in default 9 months imprisonment.
3. The applicant has approached this court pursuant to sections 357,362,364& 382 of the Criminal Procedure Code as construed with Article 50(2) (p) & (q) as conjunctively read with Article 50(6)(a) &(b) of the Constitution.
4. The applicant seeks a sentence review based on the sentence review report on record. The report is responsive. According to the report, the applicant is disciplined and she needs guidance on how to handle anger issues. The report indicated that the applicant is the first born in a family of three. His parents are deceased. He is married with three kids, the first born is in grade one in Longech Primary School. He lives in Longech with his siblings and his wife. He is a fisherman. He dropped out of school at class five. He is remorseful for his actions and seeks lenience. With these facts, the probation officer recommended a community service order at Kalokol Chief’s office for a period of three months.
5. In determining whether to impose a custodial or non-custodial sentence, the court is required to take into account the following factors: -a)Gravity of the offence: - sentence of imprisonment should be avoided for misdemeanour.b)Criminal history of the offender. Taking into account the seriousness of the offences, first offenders should be considered for non-custodial sentence.c)Character of the offender: - non-custodial sentence are best suited for offenders who are already remorseful and receptive to rehabilitative measures.d)Protection of the community: - where the offender is likely to pose a threat to the community.e)Offender’s responsibility to third parties: - where there are people depending on the offender.
6. Further to the aforementioned, the Community Service Orders Act makes it possible for courts to issue an order requiring the offender to perform community service. This option is available to court when the offender is convicted of an offence punishable by imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or imprisonment for a term exceeding three years but for which the court determines that any of that term as would be appropriate be served within the community on unpaid public works.
7. Having gone through the facts of the present case, the circumstances fit the legal framework of the Community Service Act as an alternative sentence to imprisonment. I am of the considered view that the circumstances of this case from the onset called for a non-custodial sentence to help the Applicant go through guidance and counselling on managing her anger issues. I believe a non-custodial sentence would be greatly benefit the applicant with proper guidance and counselling. Consequently, the effective measure as recommended by the probation officer is to have the applicant serve a community service order for a period of three months at Kalokol Chief’s office. The probation officer has an obligation in ensuring that the applicant undergoes professional counselling to help her manage anger issues. Monthly reports shall be filed in court by the supervisor of the applicant through the probation officer. The essence of it is to achieve the effectiveness of this non-custodial sentence and that any breach of any conditions by the applicant shall attract cancellation of the community service order and have the sentence reverted to custodial sanctions.
8. It is so ordered.
SIGNED, DATE AND DELIVERED AT LODWAR THIS 11THDAY OF JULY2024. …………………………………….R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE