[2013] KEELC 42 (KLR)

[2013] KEELC 42 (KLR)

The court found that the application for file reconstruction could not be supported under Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as that provision relates to attachment of debts. However, the court held that Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act grants it inherent discretion to make any order necessary to ensure the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELC 42 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Lorna Jemutai Rono & Another; Respondent: David Oito
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 12 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for File Reconstruction
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
File Reconstruction, Missing Court Record, Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property File Reconstruction Missing Court Record Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lorna Jemutai Rono & Another

Applicant

David Oito

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for File Reconstruction

  1. 1 Whether the court should order reconstruction of a missing court file.
  2. 2 Whether the application is properly anchored in law given the cited provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for file reconstruction could not be supported under Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as that provision relates to attachment of debts. However, the court held that Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act grants it inherent discretion to make any order necessary to ensure the ends of justice are met. Upon confirmation from Justice Ibrahim that the original file could not be traced, the court was satisfied that the file was lost or misplaced. Accordingly, the court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to permit reconstruction of the file and directed that the reconstructed file be registered in the Environment and Land Court registry.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • An order is issued permitting the reconstruction of the missing file in Eldoret HCCC No. 73 of 2007.
  • Upon reconstruction, the file shall be registered in the Environment and Land Court registry.