[2014] KEHC 4772 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution was conducted by P.C Wachira, who was not a gazetted prosecutor as required by Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This irregularity rendered the entire trial a nullity. The State conceded this point and did not seek a retrial. The court considered the period already...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 4772 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lucas Mutua Kimuyu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 181 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Stock Theft, Unqualified Prosecutor, Criminal Procedure Irregularity
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucas Mutua Kimuyu
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial was a nullity due to being conducted by an unqualified police prosecutor.
- 2 Whether the conviction was safe in light of the prosecution's irregularity.
- 3 Whether a retrial should be ordered given the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution was conducted by P.C Wachira, who was not a gazetted prosecutor as required by Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This irregularity rendered the entire trial a nullity. The State conceded this point and did not seek a retrial. The court considered the period already served by the appellant and the value of the stolen stock, concluding that a retrial was not appropriate. Consequently, the conviction was quashed and the sentence set aside, with the appellant ordered to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Orders
- The trial is declared a nullity.
- The conviction is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 181 OF 2012
LUCAS MUTUA KIMUYU …………………………………APPELANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………................................RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Kithimani Principal Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 428 of 2012 by Hon. M.A.O. Opanga, Ag. SRM on 4/12/12)
JUDGMENT
The appellant was charged with stock theft contrary to Section 278of Penal Code. The particulars of the offence being that on the night of 4th day of June, 2012 at Mamba sub–location Ndalani Location in Yatta District within Machakos County stole two she-goats all valued at Kshs. 16,000/= the property of Beatrice Syomiti Kilonzo.
In the alternative the appellant was charged with handling stolen property contrary to Section 322(1)as read with Section 322 (2) of the Penal code.
Particulars of the offence being that on the night of 5thday of June, 2012 at Kithimani sub–location Kithimani Location in Yatta District within Machakos County otherwise than in the course of stealing dishonestly retained two she-goats knowing or having reason to believe them to be stolen property.
He was tried, convicted on the main count and sentenced to serve five (5) years imprisonment.
Being aggrieved by the conviction and sentence the appellant appeals on the ground that;-
The entire trial was a nullity as part of the trial was conducted by an unqualified police prosecutor;
The case was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.
The trial magistrate misdirected herself by reaching a finding that circumstantial evidence adduced was overwhelming;
To support his appeal the appellant filed written submissions.
Ms Kefa, the learned State Counsel conceded to the appeal on the ground that proceedings were indeed a nullity as the prosecutor who conducted the case was not gazetted as required by the law. She stated that P.C Wachira was gazetted on the 7th December, 2012.
This being the first appellate court my duty is to re-consider and re-evaluate what transpired before the trial court bearing in mind that I neither saw nor heard witnesses who testified. (See Okeno versus Republic [1972] E.A 32).
It is apparent that P.C Wachira conducted the prosecution’s case when the trial commenced upto the time of its conclusion on the 4thday of December, 2012.
P.C Wachira having not been gazetted per the requirement of Section 85(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, he was an unqualified prosecutor. Having conducted the prosecution’s case, it was vitiated. The case was a nullity in the circumstances.
The State did not seek a retrial. The appellant has been in custody for two (2) years. Considering the value of the stock alleged to have been stolen, this court would not think of ordering a retrial.
I therefore declare the trial a nullity, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence meted out. The appellant shall be set at liberty, unless otherwise lawfully held.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVEREDat MACHAKOSthis 30THday of MAY, 2014.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE