[2021] KEELC 397 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 397 (KLR)

The court found that the application was unopposed and that the interests of justice required the identification of the land boundaries to facilitate execution of the judgment. The court further held that the Plaintiff/Respondent, though incarcerated, should be present during the survey to ensure transparency and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 397 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Luka Kirimi William; Defendant: Robert Miriti Murianki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 7 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Survey and Related Orders
Outcome
Application allowed as unopposed; orders granted as prayed with modifications.
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Land Adjudication, Survey Orders, Identification of Boundaries
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Execution of Judgment Land Adjudication Survey Orders Identification of Boundaries

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Luka Kirimi William

Plaintiff

Robert Miriti Murianki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Survey and Related Orders

  1. 1 Whether a survey should be ordered to identify beacons on the disputed land parcel to facilitate execution of judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff/Respondent should be present during the survey exercise despite being incarcerated.
  3. 3 Whether security should be provided during the survey to prevent hostility or obstruction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application was unopposed and that the interests of justice required the identification of the land boundaries to facilitate execution of the judgment. The court further held that the Plaintiff/Respondent, though incarcerated, should be present during the survey to ensure transparency and fairness. Security was ordered to be provided during the survey to prevent any hostility or obstruction. The Defendant/Applicant was directed to meet the costs of the survey and related charges. The orders sought were therefore granted as prayed, with directions for service on relevant authorities and a mention date fixed for further directions.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as unopposed; orders granted as prayed with modifications.

Orders

  • A survey to be conducted by the District Surveyor on Land Parcel LOWER EAST MAGUTUNI ADJUDICATION SECTION 656 to identify beacons.
  • The Plaintiff/Respondent to be escorted from prison and present during the survey exercise.