[2024] KEHC 3100 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 3100 (KLR)

The court found that there was no urgency demonstrated in the application to warrant certification as urgent. Furthermore, the court held that the petition, which concerns the appointment of the Vice Chancellor of Kaimosi Friends University, should have been filed in the High Court at Vihiga, where the university is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 3100 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Stephen Chahasi Lumwaji; Respondent: Hon Dr Ezekiel Machogu; Respondent: Public Service Commission; Respondent: Kaimosi University Council; Interested Party: Prof Ogodo Manyasi Jacob Nandi; Interested Party: Prof Peter N Mwita
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition E003 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Urgency and Jurisdiction/transfer
Outcome
Petition and application for conservatory orders not entertained; file transferred to Vihiga High Court; file at Kisumu closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of High Court, Transfer of Petitions, Appointment of Vice Chancellor
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction of High Court Transfer of Petitions Appointment of Vice Chancellor

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Chahasi Lumwaji

Applicant

Hon Dr Ezekiel Machogu

Respondent

Public Service Commission

Respondent

Kaimosi University Council

Respondent

Prof Ogodo Manyasi Jacob Nandi

Interested Party

Prof Peter N Mwita

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Urgency and Jurisdiction/transfer

  1. 1 Whether the application was urgent and merited certification as such.
  2. 2 Whether the Kisumu High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition concerning Kaimosi Friends University, domiciled in Vihiga County.
  3. 3 Whether the petition and application for conservatory orders should be entertained or transferred.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no urgency demonstrated in the application to warrant certification as urgent. Furthermore, the court held that the petition, which concerns the appointment of the Vice Chancellor of Kaimosi Friends University, should have been filed in the High Court at Vihiga, where the university is domiciled, rather than in Kisumu. As a result, the Kisumu High Court declined to entertain both the petition and the application for conservatory orders, and ordered the transfer of the file to the Vihiga High Court for further directions, hearing, and determination. The file at Kisumu was closed accordingly.

Court Disposition

Petition and application for conservatory orders not entertained; file transferred to Vihiga High Court; file at Kisumu closed.

Orders

  • The application is not certified as urgent.
  • The Kisumu High Court declines to entertain the petition and application for conservatory orders.