[2019] KEHC 9460 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 9460 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant pleaded guilty to the charge of operating a bar without a licence. The documents relied upon by the applicant, namely a receipt and a permit, did not relate to the applicant or the premises named in the charge sheet. There was no demonstrated nexus between the applicant and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 9460 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Lydia Bochaberi; Respondent: The Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Revision Case 03 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
application for revision dismissed
Legal Topics
Alcoholic Drinks Control, Licensing Offences, Plea of Guilty, Sentencing, Revision Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Alcoholic Drinks Control Licensing Offences Plea of Guilty Sentencing Revision Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lydia Bochaberi

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the conviction and sentence for operating a bar without a licence was irregular or unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence presented by the applicant established a valid licence or justified revision of the lower court's decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant pleaded guilty to the charge of operating a bar without a licence. The documents relied upon by the applicant, namely a receipt and a permit, did not relate to the applicant or the premises named in the charge sheet. There was no demonstrated nexus between the applicant and the documents. The proceedings in the lower court were regular, and the sentence imposed was within the law. Therefore, there was no basis for the court to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction to interfere with the conviction or sentence.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is dismissed.
  • The order be certified to the lower court.