[2013] KEHC 942 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 942 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant had been properly served but failed to attend court or oppose the application. The plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of a temporary inhibition order to preserve the suit properties pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 942 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lydia Nkriote Onesmus; Plaintiff: Virginia Kithure Mutwiri; Plaintiff: Betty Karabai James; Plaintiff: Joycelleen Wanja Charles; Plaintiff: Rosebeth Karoki Mbogori; Plaintiff: Esther Kananu Mbogori; Defendant: Arthur Muriithi Mbogori
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 200 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Land Registration, Interlocutory Injunctions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Inhibition Orders Land Registration Interlocutory Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lydia Nkriote Onesmus

Plaintiff

Virginia Kithure Mutwiri

Plaintiff

Betty Karabai James

Plaintiff

Joycelleen Wanja Charles

Plaintiff

Rosebeth Karoki Mbogori

Plaintiff

Esther Kananu Mbogori

Plaintiff

Arthur Muriithi Mbogori

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to a temporary order of inhibition against registration of dealings with the specified land parcels pending determination of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant had been properly served but failed to attend court or oppose the application. The plaintiffs demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of a temporary inhibition order to preserve the suit properties pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit. The court exercised its discretion to confirm the inhibition order as prayed to prevent any registration of dealings with the specified land parcels, thereby maintaining the status quo and safeguarding the interests of the parties until the main suit is heard and determined.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • A temporary order of inhibition is granted, inhibiting registration of any dealing with parcels of land L.R. NOS. ABOGETA/U-KITHANGARI/2217, 2218, and 2352 pending hearing and determination of the substantive suit.
  • A copy of the court order to be served upon the District Land Registrar, Meru Central for registration in the appropriate registers.