[2009] KEHC 3263 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable case regarding the exercise of power by public officials in detaining her motor vehicle and deciding to charge her with a criminal offence. Accordingly, leave was granted to commence judicial review proceedings for certiorari and mandamus. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 3263 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lydia Wanza Kaindi; Respondent: The Commissioner of Police; Respondent: The Attorney-General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 362 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Commence Judicial Review Proceedings
- Outcome
- Leave granted for judicial review; stay of prosecution granted; release of vehicle declined at this stage.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Mandamus, Exercise of Police Powers, Detention of Property, Stay of Prosecution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lydia Wanza Kaindi
Applicant
The Commissioner of Police
Respondent
The Attorney-General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Commence Judicial Review Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable case warranting leave to commence judicial review proceedings for certiorari and mandamus.
- 2 Whether the court should grant a stay of the decision to charge the applicant with a criminal offence.
- 3 Whether the court should order the immediate release of the applicant's motor vehicle at the ex-parte stage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated an arguable case regarding the exercise of power by public officials in detaining her motor vehicle and deciding to charge her with a criminal offence. Accordingly, leave was granted to commence judicial review proceedings for certiorari and mandamus. The court considered the request for a stay of prosecution and found it justified at this stage, granting a stay of the decision to charge the applicant with any criminal offence relating to the matter until a specified date. However, the court declined to order the immediate release of the motor vehicle at the ex-parte stage, noting uncertainty as to whether it was being held as an exhibit...
Court Disposition
Leave granted for judicial review; stay of prosecution granted; release of vehicle declined at this stage.
Orders
- The application is certified as urgent.
- Leave is granted to the applicant to file judicial review proceedings for certiorari and mandamus as requested. The Notice of Motion to be filed within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Misc Civil Appli 362 of 2009
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLCATION BY LYDIA WANZA KAINDI FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE CAP. 75 LAWS OF KENYA
AND
CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST LYDIA WANZA KAINDI
AND
THE TRAFFIC ACT CAP. 403 LAWS OF KENYA
AND
MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION KAQ 111G TOYOTA LAND CRUISER
LYDIAWANZA KAINDI………………………….............……………… APPLICANT
V E R S U S
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE…….……………………..1ST RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL…………………….…………… 2ND RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
Before me is a Chamber Summons dated 12th June, 2009 filed by M/S Maobe Maotsesung & Company advocates on behalf of the applicant named as LYDIA WANZA KAINDI. The respondents are named as THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (1st respondent)and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL (2nd respondent). The application was filed under Order LIII rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the Law Reform Act (Cap. 26), the Judicature Act, and section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.
The orders sought are that-
1. This application be certified as urgent and be heard ex-parte.
2. The applicant be granted leave to apply for orders of judicial review by way of certiorari to remove into this Honourable Court, and to quash, the decision by the Kenya Police stationed at Kilimani Police Station to charge her with criminal offences.
3. The applicant be granted leave to apply for orders of judicial review by way of mandamus to compel the Kenya Police at Kilimani Police Station to release from their custody the Applicant’s motor vehicle registration number KAQ 111G with immediate effect.
4. The grant of leave to the applicant to apply for the aforesaid orders do operate as a stay of the decision of the Kenya Police to purport to charge her with any criminal offence relating to the matter herein and to hold motor vehicle registration number KAQ 111G and the same be released to the Applicant forthwith.
5. Any other relief as this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant.
6. Costs of and incidental to this application.
The application was filed with a supporting affidavit sworn by the applicant on 12th June, 2009. There was also a STATUTORY STATEMENT dated 12th June, 2009 which was filed. In addition, there was filed an AFFIDAVIT VERIFYING STATUTORY STATEMENTsworn by the applicant on 12th June, 2009.
Counsel for the applicant, Ms Matano also addressed me in support of the application.
From the documents filed, there is clearly an intention by the police to charge the applicant her in a criminal case at Kibera Law Courts, for forgery. The complaint of the applicant is with regard to the purported exercise of power, by the Commissioner of Police and the Attorney-General, in detaining her motor vehicle and deciding to charge her with a criminal offence. The applicant claims to have acquired the motor vehicle legally, through a legal purchase.
Having considered the facts before me, I am of the view that the applicant has demonstrated an arguable case. I will grant leave to file judicial review proceedings as I consider that there is something with regard to the exercise of power by public officials that needs to be investigated by this court.
The applicant has asked for a stay of the decision to charge her, as well as release of the motor vehicle forthwith. Though stay orders regarding the prosecution might be justified, the release of the vehicle at this stage, in my view, might be inappropriate. I am not certain whether the said motor vehicle has been held as an exhibit. I will be reluctant to release the vehicle at this ex-parte stage.
Consequently, I order as follows-
1. I certify the application as urgent.
2. Leave is granted to the applicant to file judicial review proceedings for certiorari and mandamus as requested. The Notice of motion will be filed within 14 days from today.
3. I grant stay of the decision of the Kenya Police to charge the applicant with any criminaloffence relating to the matter up to 24th July, 2009 unless extended or varied by this court.
4. Costs will follow the decision in the Notice of Motion to be filed.
5. Mention on 24/7/2009.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 25th day of June, 2009.
George Dulu
Judge.