[2007] KEHC 1816 (KLR)
The court found that there was a communication breakdown during the confirmation proceedings, likely due to interpretation issues, resulting in the applicant's affidavit of protest not being considered. The court held that the confirmation of grant was therefore procedurally flawed. Applying the principle that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 1816 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lydiah Wangu Karingithi; Applicant: John Wanjau Karingithi; Applicant: Salome Njoki; Respondent: Ben Njogu Karingithi; Respondent: Wanjau Karingithi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Succession Cause 314 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons to Cancel Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Confirmation of Grant, Revocation of Grant, Customary Law Distribution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lydiah Wangu Karingithi
Applicant
John Wanjau Karingithi
Applicant
Salome Njoki
Applicant
Ben Njogu Karingithi
Respondent
Wanjau Karingithi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons to Cancel Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 26th October 2006 should be cancelled due to failure to consider the applicant's affidavit of protest.
- 2 Whether the confirmation of grant was conducted in accordance with the law and with due consideration of all parties' objections.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was a communication breakdown during the confirmation proceedings, likely due to interpretation issues, resulting in the applicant's affidavit of protest not being considered. The court held that the confirmation of grant was therefore procedurally flawed. Applying the principle that the certificate of confirmation can be cancelled without affecting the validity of the parent grant, the court determined that the applicant's complaint was merited and ordered cancellation of the certificate of confirmation issued on 26th October 2006. The original certificate was to be returned to the court for cancellation, and costs were ordered to be in the cause.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The certificate of confirmation of grant issued on 26th October 2006 is hereby cancelled.
- The original certificate of confirmed grant collected from the court by Catherine on behalf of Kinyua Kiama Advocate shall be returned to this court within 14 days for cancellation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
AT THE HIGH COURT IN NYERI
SUCCESSION CAUSE 314 OF 2004
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DUNCAN KARINGITHI..DECEASED
LYDIAH WANGU KARINGITHI………………………………1ST PETITIONER?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /
JOHN WANJAU KARINGITHI……………………………..…..2ND PETITIONER
SALOME NJOKI ……………………………………….…………3RD PETITIONER
Versus
BEN NJOGU KARINGITHI………….…………1ST OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT
WANJAU KARINGITHI ……………….……....2ND OBJECTOR/RESPONDENT
RULING
Summons dated 23rd of July 2007 seeks that the certificate of Confirmation of Grant, which was issued by this court on 26th October, 2006 be cancelled.In support of the application the 1st Petitioner has deponed in her affidavit that her co-administrators filed for confirmation of grant which was confirmed on 26th October, 2006. On being served with that application she filed an affidavit of protest.Her protest was in regard to the distribution in that application for confirmation.When the application for confirmation came up in court on 26th October, 2006 she was in attendance in court.Through an interpreter she was asked whether she was agreeable to the confirmation.She stated that she was not agreeable.Again through an interpreter she was asked by the court whether she had filed any papers in opposition.She deponed in her affidavit that although her response was that she had filed an affidavit in opposition the court record indicated that she stated she had not filed those papers.The court accordingly proceeded to confirm the grant as prayed.The applicant stated that the confirmation was without benefit of her affidavit in protest.
The application was opposed by the objections.In opposing the objectors stated in their replying affidavit that they were unaware of the affidavit of protest and that they had not been served.They argued that the grant had been confirmed in accordance to the kikuyu customary law.The advocate for the objectors in opposition submitted that the court cannot grant the prayers that are sought by the applicant.He stated that if the applicant was not satisfied with confirmation the applicant should have filed an appeal.The objectors advocate was in agreement with the authority relied on by the applicant mainly the case of In Re Estate of Ngugi (Deceased) (2002) 2 KLR.In that case it was held as follows:
“Where the complaint of the applicant related to the certificate of confirmation only, revocation or annulmentof the relevant grant should not be asked for in the application as the certificate of confirmation of a grant could be dealt with without affecting the validity and soundness of the parent grant of letters of administration or the parent grant of probate.”
In considering the present application it is important to note that the applicant and the court were not speaking the same language.It is possible there was communication break down in view of the interpretation.Accordingly I do find that the application is merited and the court does hereby grant the following orders:
1. That the certificate of confirmation of grant issued by this court on 26th October 2006 is hereby cancelled.
2. That the original certificate of confirmed grant collected from the court by Catherine who picked it on behalf of the firm of Kinyua Kiama Advocate shall be returned by the said firm to this court within 14 days from this date hereof for cancellation.
3. The costs of the summons dated 23rd July, 2007 shall be in the cause.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Dated and delivered at Nyeri this 15th day of November 2007.
BY.M. S. A MAKHANDIA
JUDGE