[2013] KEHC 1159 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner on 27th August 2006 and never returned, and that all efforts at reconciliation had failed. The evidence of desertion was uncontroverted, and there was no indication of collusion or condonation by the petitioner. The court was satisfied that the marriage had...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1159 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: M L C; Respondent: P S M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2013
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 70 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Breakdown, Desertion, Undefended Petition
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M L C
Applicant
P S M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner, leading to irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
- 2 Whether there was collusion or condonation by the petitioner in the alleged desertion.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner on 27th August 2006 and never returned, and that all efforts at reconciliation had failed. The evidence of desertion was uncontroverted, and there was no indication of collusion or condonation by the petitioner. The court was satisfied that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to the respondent's desertion, and therefore granted the petition for dissolution of the marriage.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage celebrated between the petitioner and respondent on 8th August 1981 is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue forthwith, to be made absolute after thirty (30) days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment