[2014] KEHC 5525 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 5525 (KLR)

The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and the 1st respondent had irretrievably broken down due to uncontroverted allegations of adultery and cruelty. The respondents failed to respond to the petition or contest the evidence, and there was no indication of collusion or condonation. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 5525 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: M M M; Respondent: A K M; Respondent: P M G
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Divorce Cause 15 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Judges
DN Musyoka
Legal Topics
Divorce, Adultery, Cruelty, Child Custody, Maintenance of Children
Source Language
en
Family and Children Divorce Adultery Cruelty Child Custody Maintenance of Children

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M M M

Petitioner

A K M

Respondent

P M G

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and the 1st respondent has irretrievably broken down.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st respondent committed adultery with the 2nd respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the 1st respondent was cruel to the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the marriage between the petitioner and the 1st respondent had irretrievably broken down due to uncontroverted allegations of adultery and cruelty. The respondents failed to respond to the petition or contest the evidence, and there was no indication of collusion or condonation. The court therefore dissolved the marriage, granted joint custody of the children with actual possession to the respondent, and directed that all matters regarding custody and maintenance be referred to the Children’s Court. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

petition allowed; marriage dissolved

Orders

  • The marriage celebrated between the petitioner and respondent on 23rd November 2006 is dissolved.
  • Joint custody of the two children is granted to the parties, with the respondent to have possession of the children who are of tender years.