M W v Republic [2017] KEHC 9730 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 9730 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Case number
- Criminal Appeal 208 of 2015
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Case number
- Criminal Appeal 208 of 2015
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that the trial magistrate did not err in sentencing the appellant to the statutory minimum of seven years imprisonment for preparation to commit a felony, as Section 308(1) of the Penal Code is couched in mandatory terms regarding the minimum penalty. However, considering the appellant's youth, his status as a first offender, and the interests of justice, the court found that the appellant had served a sufficient sentence. Consequently, the court set aside the remaining sentence and ordered the appellant's immediate release.
Court disposition
sentence set aside; appellant to be released forthwith
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is set aside.
- The appellant is to be released from custody forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
02
Material facts
Parties
M W
AppellantRepublic
Respondent Counsel: Ms. SigeiAmounts and remedies
- Original Sentence (years): 7
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the sentence of seven years imprisonment imposed on the appellant for preparation to commit a felony was lawful and appropriate.
- 02
Whether the appellant's age and status as a first offender warranted a reduction or setting aside of the sentence.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that he was only 20 years old at the time of sentencing, was a first offender, and had been persuaded by his co-accused to misrepresent his age as 21 when he was actually underage. He pleaded for leniency, stating that it would be disappointing if he died in prison and requested the court to intervene as he did not receive remission for his sentence.
- Respondent
- Ms. Sigei for the respondent submitted that the appellant was sentenced to the minimum sentence provided by law, which was seven years imprisonment, and described it as lenient. She argued that the appellant did not inform the trial court that he was below 18 years of age at the time of the charge and urged the court to dismiss the appeal.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 308(1), Penal Code (Cap 63, Laws of Kenya)
Section 308(1) of the Penal Code prescribes a mandatory minimum sentence of seven years imprisonment for preparation to commit a felony while armed with a dangerous weapon.
- 02
Section 308(1), Penal Code; general sentencing jurisprudence
Courts are bound by statutory minimum sentences and cannot vary them unless there are exceptional circumstances or the law provides otherwise.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that the trial magistrate did not err in sentencing the appellant to the statutory minimum of seven years imprisonment for preparation to commit a felony, as Section 308(1) of the Penal Code is couched in mandatory terms regarding the minimum penalty. However, considering the appellant's youth, his status as a first offender, and the interests of justice, the court found that the appellant had served a sufficient sentence. Consequently, the court set aside the remaining sentence and ordered the appellant's immediate release.
Obiter and limits
- The provision is couched in mandatory terms in so far as providing a minimum penalty. The court cannot vary the minimum penalty provided by the law.
- Considering the facts of this case and further taking into account that the appellant is a young man and a first offender, justice would be served by setting aside the sentence.
Court disposition
sentence set aside; appellant to be released forthwith
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is set aside.
- The appellant is to be released from custody forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NUMBER 208 Of 2015.
BETWEEN
M W...............................................APPELLANT.
AND
REPUBLIC................................RESPONDENT.
(An appeal from the original conviction and sentence in the Chief Magistrate’s court at Makadara Cr. Case No. 4397 of 2014 delivered by Hon.Olwande, PM on 21st August 2015).
JUDGMENT.
Background.
M W, the Appellant herein was the second accused in the trial having been jointly charged with the offence of preparation to commit a felony contrary to Section 308(1) of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence were that on 17th September, 2014 at Mathare 3C within Starehe Sub-County within Nairobi County were found armed with dangerous weapons namely knives in circumstances that indicated that they were so armed with the intent to commit a felony namely robbery. The Appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment. His co-accused was acquitted.
By a petition of appeal filed on 17th December, 2015 the Appellant preferred the appeal against both the conviction and sentence. But when the appeal was canvassedon 17th October, 2017 the Appellant submitted that he was only appealing against the sentence. He submitted that he was currently only 20 years of age and being a young man who could go out and lead a better life, it would be disappointing if he died in prison. He also told the court that his co-accused persuaded him to tell the court that he was then aged 21 years when in fact he was under age.
Ms. Sigei, for the Respondent, submitted that the Appellant was sentenced to the minimum sentence provided by the law of seven years imprisonment which she said was lenient. With regard to the Appellant’s age she submitted that he did not inform the court that he was below 18 years of age when he was charged. She urged the court to dismiss the appeal.
In reply, the Appellant submitted that he was cheated to lie that he was an adult and that he also did not get remission for the sentence. He urged the court to intervene.
Section 308(1) of the Penal Code provides:
Any person found armed with any dangerous or offensive weapon in circumstances that indicate that he was so armed with intent to commit any felony is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment of not less than seven years and not more than fifteen years. (emphasis mine).
Ineed not belabor to restate that the provision is couched in mandatory terms in so far as providing a minimum penalty. The court cannot vary the minimum penalty provided by the law. Thus the trial magistrate did not err in sentencing the Appellant to seven years imprisonment which was very reasonable. However, considering the facts of this case and further taking into account that the Appellant is a young man, was a first offender and for purposes of serving justice, I order that he has served sufficient sentence. I accordingly set aside the sentence and order that he be forthwith set free.
Dated And Delivered at Nairobi This 7th November, 2017.
G.W.NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE.
In the presence of;
1. Appellant in person.
2. ……………. for the Respondent.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.