[2006] KEHC 1378 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff's claim, as pleaded in the plaint, is for the recovery of land, specifically the retransfer of L.R. NO.IRIAINI/KAIRIA/106. Therefore, the applicable limitation period is twelve years under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, not six years under Section 4(a) as argued by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1378 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Macharia Mariu; Defendant: Joseph Nguthiru Kang'aru
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 62 of 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Chamber Summons to Strike Out Defence
- Outcome
- defendant's application dismissed
- Judges
- JL Osiemo
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Recovery of Land, Striking Out Pleadings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Macharia Mariu
Plaintiff
Joseph Nguthiru Kang'aru
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Chamber Summons to Strike Out Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is time barred under the Limitation of Actions Act.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's claim is founded on contract or recovery of land.
- 3 Whether the defence should be struck out for disclosing no cause of action.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff's claim, as pleaded in the plaint, is for the recovery of land, specifically the retransfer of L.R. NO.IRIAINI/KAIRIA/106. Therefore, the applicable limitation period is twelve years under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, not six years under Section 4(a) as argued by the defendant. Since the suit was brought within the twelve-year limitation period for recovery of land, it is not time barred. Consequently, the defendant's application to strike out the defence for disclosing no cause of action fails.
Court Disposition
defendant's application dismissed
Orders
- The defendant's Chamber Summons dated 3rd March 2005 is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Civil Case 62 of 2005
MACHARIA MARIU……………………….....................................................……………………PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
JOSEPH NGUTHIRU KANG’ARU….……........................................................……………….DEFENDANT
RULING
The defendant brought this Chamber Summons under Order VI Rule 13 and Rule 16 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act for orders that the defendant’s defence be dismissed as it discloses no cause of action.
The application is based on the ground that the suit is time barred by virtue of the provisions of the Limitations of Actions Act Cap 22 Laws of Kenya.
The application is also supported by a sworn affidavit of the applicant in which he avers that this is based on a contractual Agreement and under Section 4(a) of the Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22 any actions founded on contract may not be brought after the end of 6 years. According to counsel for the applicant the cause of action arose on 9th August 1990 and therefore the suit is time barred.
The application is opposed by the plaintiff who has filed Replying Affidavit in which he avers that the suit should not be struck out as the same raises triable issues.
Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the claim falls under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act Cap 22 and not under Section 4 of the statute Section 7 provides:-
“An action may not be brought by any person to recover land after the end of twelve years from the date on which the right of action accrued to him or if it first accrued to some person through whom he claims to that person.”
It is clear from paragraph 8(e) of the plaint that what the plaintiff is seeking is Recovery of Land i.e retransfer of L.R. NO.IRIAINI/KAIRIA/106 back to him so that the claim falls under Section 7 of the Act.
The defendant’s Chamber Summons dated 3rd March 2005 is therefore dismissed with costs.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 14th day of September 2006.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
JUDGE