[2025] KEHC 1663 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 1663 (KLR)

The court found that since the last substantive action on 14th May, 2024, no steps had been taken by either party to prosecute the case. Despite being served with a Notice to Show Cause, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendant appeared or offered any explanation. The plaintiffs' counsel had previously indicated a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 1663 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Josphat Chege Macharia; Plaintiff: Joykisco Enterprises Limited; Defendant: Equity Bank Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Case E017 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Case Management, Notice to Show Cause
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Case Management Notice to Show Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josphat Chege Macharia

Plaintiff

Joykisco Enterprises Limited

Plaintiff

Equity Bank Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the last substantive action on 14th May, 2024, no steps had been taken by either party to prosecute the case. Despite being served with a Notice to Show Cause, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendant appeared or offered any explanation. The plaintiffs' counsel had previously indicated a possible settlement and sought time to file a consent order, but failed to do so. The court concluded that the plaintiffs had lost interest in the matter, and in accordance with Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules, it was appropriate to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed for want of prosecution.

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for want of prosecution as per Order 17 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.