[2022] KEHC 13859 (KLR)
The court held that the requirements for a grant ad litem under paragraph 14 of the fifth schedule to the Law of Succession Act were satisfied: there was a pending suit, the deceased was a party, and no entitled person had applied for administration. The technical objections raised by the respondent regarding service, affidavit formalities, and citation were found not to go to the substance of the matter. The court found that the applicant was entitled to seek the grant ad litem to ensure the continuation of the pending suit and that the respondent, as the deceased's son, was a suitable nominee. The court further held that the existence or merits of the underlying property dispute were...
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 13859 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucy Mwihiki Macharia; Respondent: Solomon Njenga Githendu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2022
- Case Number
- Probate & Administration E0015 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application to Revoke Grant Ad Litem
- Outcome
- Grant ad litem upheld for ninety days with directions for further action.
- Judges
- RM Mwongo
- Legal Topics
- Limited Grants, Ad Litem Administration, Succession Procedure, Citation Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucy Mwihiki Macharia
Applicant
Solomon Njenga Githendu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration / Ruling on Application to Revoke Grant Ad Litem
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant ad litem issued to the respondent should be revoked or upheld.
- 2 Whether the applicant had legal capacity to apply for the grant ad litem.
- 3 Whether the power of attorney relied upon lapsed upon the deceased's death.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the requirements for a grant ad litem under paragraph 14 of the fifth schedule to the Law of Succession Act were satisfied: there was a pending suit, the deceased was a party, and no entitled person had applied for administration. The technical objections raised by the respondent regarding service, affidavit formalities, and citation were found not to go to the substance of the matter. The court found that the applicant was entitled to seek the grant ad litem to ensure the continuation of the pending suit and that the respondent, as the deceased's son, was a suitable nominee. The court further held that the existence or merits of the underlying property dispute were...
Court Disposition
Grant ad litem upheld for ninety days with directions for further action.
Orders
- The letters of grant ad litem issued on October 21, 2021 are upheld for ninety days to enable the respondent to file or cause to be filed a petition for grant of letters of administration or a citation.
- If after ninety days the grantee has not filed or caused to be filed a citation or petition, the grant ad litem shall continue to be in force.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment