[2024] KEELC 3830 (KLR)
The court held that since the appeal was withdrawn before directions for hearing were given and only minimal court attendance had occurred, it would be just to award minimal costs to the 2nd Respondent. The Deputy Registrar was directed to assess these minimal costs, recognizing that the withdrawal occurred at an...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 3830 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joseph Kiemo Macharia; Respondent: Mary Muthoni Mundia; Respondent: Agnes Muthoni Mundia
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal 12 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Costs Following Withdrawal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Minimal costs awarded to the 2nd Respondent, to be assessed by the Deputy Registrar.
- Judges
- AK Bor
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Appeal, Award of Costs, Court Discretion on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Kiemo Macharia
Appellant
Mary Muthoni Mundia
Respondent
Agnes Muthoni Mundia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Ruling on Costs Following Withdrawal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2nd Respondent should be awarded costs following the withdrawal of the appeal before directions were given.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the appeal was withdrawn before directions for hearing were given and only minimal court attendance had occurred, it would be just to award minimal costs to the 2nd Respondent. The Deputy Registrar was directed to assess these minimal costs, recognizing that the withdrawal occurred at an early stage and that no substantive hearing had taken place.
Court Disposition
Minimal costs awarded to the 2nd Respondent, to be assessed by the Deputy Registrar.
Orders
- The 2nd Respondent is awarded minimal costs for court attendance, to be assessed by the Deputy Registrar.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Macharia v Mundia & another (Environment and Land Appeal 12 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3830 (KLR) (29 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 3830 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nanyuki
Environment and Land Appeal 12 of 2023
AK Bor, J
April 29, 2024
Between
Joseph Kiemo Macharia
Appellant
and
Mary Muthoni Mundia
1st Respondent
Agnes Muthoni Mundia
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. The Appellant withdrew the appeal vide the notice dated 10/11/2023, which indicated that the Appellant was withdrawing the appeal in its entirety with no orders as to cost. The 2nd Respondent, who sought to be paid costs on the withdrawal of the appeal conceded that the court had not given directions for the hearing of the appeal.
2. The court directed parties to file submissions on the issue of costs following the withdrawal of the appeal. The 2nd Respondent relied on Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act giving the court discretion to award costs and determine by whom the costs are to be paid. The 2nd Respondent maintained that costs are meant to compensate the successful party for the trouble they took in prosecuting or defending a case. She urged the court to award her costs.
3. On her part, the Appellant submitted that the appeal was withdrawn before the filing of the record of appeal and before directions were given on the hearing of the appeal. The Appellant contended that although costs follow the event, no event had happened in this instance to justify an award for costs.
4. The issue for consideration is whether the court should award the 2nd Respondent costs. The court had not given directions on the hearing of the appeal and all that had happened is that parties attended court for mention for purposes of the court giving directions on the hearing of the appeal.
5. In the court’s view minimal costs for court attendance to be assessed by the Deputy Registrar would suffice as costs to the 2nd Respondent based on the fact that the appeal was withdrawn before directions on its hearing were given by the court.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NYAHURURU THIS 29TH OF APRIL 2024. K. BORJUDGEIn the presence of: -Mr. William Bwonwong’a for the 1st RespondentNo appearance for the Appellant