[2024] KEELC 1646 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 1646 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had demonstrated registration as proprietors of the suit parcels, establishing a prima facie case with a likelihood of success. The risk of the properties being sold or subdivided by the defendants posed a real danger of irreparable loss to the plaintiffs, which could not be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 1646 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Samuel Macharia; Plaintiff: Judy Njeri Thuo; Defendant: Nine Sisters Limited; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E017 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
interlocutory injunction granted
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Ownership Disputes, Fraudulent Transfer, Injunctive Relief, Land Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Ownership Disputes Fraudulent Transfer Injunctive Relief Land Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Macharia

Plaintiff

Judy Njeri Thuo

Plaintiff

Nine Sisters Limited

Defendant

Chief Land Registrar

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case with a likelihood of success to warrant a temporary injunction.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable loss if the injunction is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the balance of convenience tilts in favour of granting the injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had demonstrated registration as proprietors of the suit parcels, establishing a prima facie case with a likelihood of success. The risk of the properties being sold or subdivided by the defendants posed a real danger of irreparable loss to the plaintiffs, which could not be adequately compensated by damages. The balance of convenience favoured the plaintiffs, as they stood to suffer greater harm if the injunction was not granted. The court therefore issued a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from advertising for sale, offering for sale, selling, transferring, subdividing, or registering any subdivision over the specified parcels of land...

Court Disposition

interlocutory injunction granted

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the defendants, their servants, employees, and/or agents from advertising for sale, offering for sale, selling, transferring, subdividing, or registering any subdivision over Miti Mingi/Mbaruk Block 8/1354, 8/1353, 8/1356, 8/1357, 8/1361, 8/1358, 8/1359, and 8/1360...
  • Costs to be in the cause.