https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5052

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/5052

Because the application for stay of implementation was not opposed by the 1st respondent and the Attorney General, the court granted a stay of implementation of the lower court's order pending disposal of the appeal, with costs to abide the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 5052 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Madalina Kathao Kalunge; 1st Respondent: Josephat Thiane Muthuri; 2nd Respondent: Igembe South Sub-County/County Surveyor; 3rd Respondent: The Land Registrar Meru North; 4th Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Land Case Appeal E066 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Court Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Implementation Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["BM Eboso"]
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution/implementation, Surveyor's Report, Interlocutory Relief Pending Appeal, Consent/non Opposition to Application
Source Language
en
Land Law Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Stay of Execution/implementation Surveyor's Report Interlocutory Relief Pending Appeal Consent/non Opposition to Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Madalina Kathao Kalunge

Appellant

Josephat Thiane Muthuri

1st Respondent

Igembe South Sub-County/County Surveyor

2nd Respondent

The Land Registrar Meru North

3rd Respondent

Attorney General

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Court Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Stay of Implementation Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the court should stay implementation of the lower court's order pending determination of the appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents opposed the application for stay.

Ratio Decidendi

Because the application for stay of implementation was not opposed by the 1st respondent and the Attorney General, the court granted a stay of implementation of the lower court's order pending disposal of the appeal, with costs to abide the appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Stay of implementation of the order of the lower court made on 20/8/2025 granted pending disposal of the appeal.
  • Costs of the application dated 17/6/2026 to be in the appeal.