[2019] KEELC 578 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 578 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the suit land, and the plaintiffs failed to prove the existence of a trust in the earlier judgment. Under Section 24 of the Land Registration Act, the applicant is entitled to absolute ownership and all attendant rights. The plaintiffs, having lost their...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 578 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Madalina Wambui Marete; Plaintiff: Joseph Muciijia; Defendant: Julius Kigutu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 5 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Outcome
Application allowed with costs to the applicant/defendant.
Legal Topics
Eviction Orders, Inhibition Lifting, Land Ownership, Injunctive Relief
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Eviction Orders Inhibition Lifting Land Ownership Injunctive Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Madalina Wambui Marete

Plaintiff

Joseph Muciijia

Plaintiff

Julius Kigutu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the inhibition registered against the suit land should be lifted.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs should be evicted from the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether an injunction should issue restraining the plaintiffs from interfering with the defendant's possession.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the suit land, and the plaintiffs failed to prove the existence of a trust in the earlier judgment. Under Section 24 of the Land Registration Act, the applicant is entitled to absolute ownership and all attendant rights. The plaintiffs, having lost their claim, have no legal basis to remain on the land or to maintain the inhibition. The court therefore allowed the application to lift the inhibition, ordered eviction of the plaintiffs, and granted an injunction restraining them from interfering with the applicant's possession.

Court Disposition

Application allowed with costs to the applicant/defendant.

Orders

  • The inhibition registered against Parcel No. NYAKI/KITHOKA/685 is lifted.
  • The plaintiffs are to be evicted from the suit land.