[2019] KEHC 2919 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 2919 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory aspect of the death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The applicant, having been sentenced under this provision, is entitled to a resentencing hearing where the trial court will consider his mitigation and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 2919 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Madaraka Kasyuko Mwendwa; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Garissa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 26 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Resentencing
Outcome
Application for resentencing allowed. Death sentence set aside. Matter remitted to Magistrate's Court for resentencing.
Judges
CM Kariuki
Legal Topics
Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Constitutional Rights
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Robbery With Violence Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Constitutional Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Madaraka Kasyuko Mwendwa

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Resentencing

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to resentencing based on the unconstitutionality of the mandatory death sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory aspect of the death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional. The applicant, having been sentenced under this provision, is entitled to a resentencing hearing where the trial court will consider his mitigation and the period he has spent in custody. The prosecution did not oppose the application, and the court exercised its discretion to set aside the death sentence and remit the matter to the trial court for resentencing.

Court Disposition

Application for resentencing allowed. Death sentence set aside. Matter remitted to Magistrate's Court for resentencing.

Orders

  • The death sentence is set aside.
  • The matter is sent back to Magistrate’s Court at Mwingi for resentencing after considering the mitigation of the applicant plus the period he has been in custody since arrest.