[2023] KEELRC 903 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's suit was filed three years and six months after the cause of action arose, exceeding the statutory limitation period of three years mandated by Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. The court relied on established case law and statutory provisions to hold that it lacked...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 903 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jack Madialo; Respondent: Explico Insurance Company Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 555 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Limitation Period
- Outcome
- suit struck out for want of jurisdiction
- Judges
- MN Nduma
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Periods, Unlawful Termination, Employment Contracts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jack Madialo
Applicant
Explico Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Limitation Period
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is statute barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain a claim filed outside the statutory limitation period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's suit was filed three years and six months after the cause of action arose, exceeding the statutory limitation period of three years mandated by Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. The court relied on established case law and statutory provisions to hold that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the claim, as the limitation period had lapsed. Consequently, the suit was struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
suit struck out for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- The suit is struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Madialo v Explico Insurance Company Limited (Cause 555 of 2021) [2023] KEELRC 903 (KLR) (13 April 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELRC 903 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause 555 of 2021
MN Nduma, J
April 13, 2023
Between
Jack Madialo
Claimant
and
Explico Insurance Company Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The respondent filed a Preliminary Objection to the suit dated July 7, 2022 to wit, that the suit filed on December 19, 2018 is statute barred the cause of action having arisen on June 16, 2015 hence the filing was done outside the 3 years limitation period mandated under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. The Preliminary Objection was filed following an Order by this Court dated June 2, 2021 transferring Milimani Chief Magistrate Court Cause No 687 of 2018 to this Court, upon application by the Claimant on grounds that the salary earned by the claimant being Kshs 230,714 per month placed the matter beyond the jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate Court.
2. The Court has considered the submissions by the parties and in particular the record of the Chief Magistrate Court at Nairobi, Civil Case No 687 of 2018, now placed before this Court and further the Memorandum of Claim filed on December 19, 2018 in which is pleaded at paragraph 9 thereof that on June 16, 2016, the respondent issued the claimant with a letter of termination in which the reasons for termination were given.
3. The remedies sought by the claimant include a declaration by the Court that the said termination of employment was unlawful and unfair and that the claimant be paid the equivalent of 12 months’ salary in compensation in respect of the termination. The claimant further claims terminal benefits including payment in lieu of leave days not taken and in lieu of notice, interest and costs.
4. On the facts not placed in dispute, and discernable on the face of the pleadings, the suit was filed 3 years and 6 months from the date the cause of action arose.
5. On the authority of a plethora of cases by this Court and the Court of Appeal including:-Hilano Mwasolo vs Kenya Commercial Bank – (2013) eKLR, Nyambuto Anambe Ayesa vs Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited [2015] eKLR, and the Court of Appeal decision in Attorney General & Another vs Andrew Maina Githinji & another [2016] eKLR, this claim is untenable having been filed out of time hence deprive the Court of jurisdiction to entertain it.
6. The suit is therefore struck out for want of jurisdiction with no order as to costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI (VIRTUALLY) THIS 13RD DAY OF APRIL, 2023. MATHEWS N NDUMAJUDGEAppearancesM/s Magu for ClaimantMr Mugwe for respondentEkale – Court Assistant