[2009] KEHC 1277 (KLR)

[2009] KEHC 1277 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries resulting in permanent paraplegia and total dependence on others for daily living, following a road traffic accident for which liability had already been apportioned at 80% against the 2nd defendant and 20% against the plaintiff. The court held that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] KEHC 1277 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Madina Gathoni; Defendant: Ali Shalo Shosi; Defendant: Alwi Shariff Ali
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 11 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant at 80% liability; case against 1st defendant withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Road Traffic Accident, Assessment of Damages, Contributory Negligence
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident Assessment of Damages Contributory Negligence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Madina Gathoni

Plaintiff

Ali Shalo Shosi

Defendant

Alwi Shariff Ali

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff proved special damages as pleaded and to what extent.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for loss of earnings and earning capacity.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for nursing care and future medical expenses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff suffered catastrophic injuries resulting in permanent paraplegia and total dependence on others for daily living, following a road traffic accident for which liability had already been apportioned at 80% against the 2nd defendant and 20% against the plaintiff. The court held that special damages must be strictly proved and awarded only the amounts supported by receipts. Claims for loss of earnings were not supported by documentary evidence, so the court used the minimum wage and a reasonable multiplier to assess loss of earning capacity. Nursing care was awarded based on the demonstrated need for two aides, given the plaintiff's condition. General...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff against the 2nd defendant at 80% liability; case against 1st defendant withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded special damages of Kshs.517,773 less 20% contribution.
  • Plaintiff awarded loss of earning capacity of Kshs.864,000 less 20% contribution.