[2022] KEPPDT 1026 (KLR)

[2022] KEPPDT 1026 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the 1st Interested Party had a legitimate interest in the proceedings and acted diligently. The matter had proceeded ex parte, depriving the Tribunal of all relevant facts, particularly those concerning the legality and constitutionality of the party organ whose findings were integral to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEPPDT 1026 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gasper Mafutu; Respondent: National Elections Board, Democratic Action Party – Kenya; Interested Party: Erick Wafula Wanyonyi; Interested Party: Independent Election and Boundaries Committee (IEBC)
Court
Political Parties Disputes Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Complaint E003 (KK) of 2022
Procedural Posture
Complaint / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment
Outcome
Ex parte judgment set aside; parties granted leave to file submissions; matter to proceed for further directions.
Judges
ML Odongo, T K Tororey, L Wambui
Legal Topics
Ex Parte Judgment, Setting Aside Orders, Right to Be Heard, Party Organs Legality
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Election Petitions Ex Parte Judgment Setting Aside Orders Right to Be Heard Party Organs Legality

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gasper Mafutu

Applicant

National Elections Board, Democratic Action Party – Kenya

Respondent

Erick Wafula Wanyonyi

Interested Party

Independent Election and Boundaries Committee (IEBC)

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Complaint / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the ex parte judgment should be set aside to allow the Interested Party to be heard.
  2. 2 Whether there was discovery of new and important evidence not previously available to the Tribunal.
  3. 3 Whether the right to fair hearing was violated by proceeding in the absence of the Interested Party.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the 1st Interested Party had a legitimate interest in the proceedings and acted diligently. The matter had proceeded ex parte, depriving the Tribunal of all relevant facts, particularly those concerning the legality and constitutionality of the party organ whose findings were integral to the original judgment. The Tribunal held that these were facts not within its knowledge at the time of the initial decision. In the interests of justice and fair hearing, and in accordance with the principles governing review and setting aside of judgments, the Tribunal set aside its earlier judgment to allow all parties to be heard and to ensure a fair determination of the...

Court Disposition

Ex parte judgment set aside; parties granted leave to file submissions; matter to proceed for further directions.

Orders

  • The judgment of the Tribunal issued on April 29, 2022 is set aside.
  • Leave is granted to the 1st Interested Party to file his reply to the complaint and written submissions and serve all parties by 11:00 am on May 9, 2022.