[2003] KEHC 665 (KLR)
The court found that Osman Mohammed Haji, as the current occupant and tenant of the suit premises, is a necessary party for the effective and complete adjudication of the dispute. The court noted that the plaintiff's difficulty in identifying the intended third defendant was due to the unregistered status of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] KEHC 665 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Maganlal Nanjibhai Savani; Defendant: Kenya Textile Co. Ltd.; Defendant: Municipal Council of Mombasa; Defendant: Osman Mohammed Haji
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 398 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint to Add Third Defendant
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Amendment of Pleadings, Necessary Parties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maganlal Nanjibhai Savani
Plaintiff
Kenya Textile Co. Ltd.
Defendant
Municipal Council of Mombasa
Defendant
Osman Mohammed Haji
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint to Add Third Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to amend the plaint to add Osman Mohammed Haji as a third defendant.
- 2 Whether the presence of the intended third defendant is necessary for the effective adjudication of the dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Osman Mohammed Haji, as the current occupant and tenant of the suit premises, is a necessary party for the effective and complete adjudication of the dispute. The court noted that the plaintiff's difficulty in identifying the intended third defendant was due to the unregistered status of the lease, and that the involvement of the intended third defendant is essential to resolve all questions in the suit. The court held that the amendment would not prejudice the existing parties but would instead facilitate the gathering of all necessary information for the resolution of the issues in controversy. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave for the...
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Plaintiff granted leave to add Osman Mohammed Haji as third defendant.
- Plaint and amended chamber summons to be amended within ten days from the date of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CIVIL SUIT NO. 398 OF 2002
MAGANLAL NANJIBHAI SAVANI………………………………PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
1. KENYA TEXTILE CO. LTD.
2. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF MOMBASA…………….…DEFENDANTS
R U L I N G
The plaintiff seeks to amend his plaint and the amended chamber summons dated 27. 11. 2002 to add a third Defendant known as Osman Mohammed Haji. The Chamber Summons is brought under Order 1 rule 10 and order VIA rule 3 and 5, order V rule 17 of the Civil Procedure rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. The application is supported by the affidavit of Kamrudeen Ali Mohamed Kasmani sworn on 27th November 2002.
The main grounds advanced by the applicant are that the intended 3rd Defendant is a tenant to the suit premises and that he is a necessary party in the suit. Finally that he came to know the intended 3rd Defendant through the 1st defendant’s pleadings and affidavits. The application was strenuously opposed by the Respondents on the grounds that it would delay and embarrass the process of this court.
It should be noted that under Order 1 rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules the court is given wide powers to allow an application for amendment. I have perused the affidavit of Chunilal Savani sworn on 12th November 2002 and in particular paragraph 15 and the annexure marked ‘B’ which is a lease document duly executed on 18. 6.2002 and it would appear the same was not registered. Perhaps this could explain the difficult in which the plaintiff had in establishing the status of the intended 3rd defendant. The suit premises is apparently occupied by the intended 3rd Defendant and therefore any dispute concerning the suit premises cannot be dealt with without the involvement the intended 3rd Defendant. It is my considered view that the presence before this court of the intended 3rd Defendant is necessary party in order for this court to effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in this suit.
The amendment will not prejudice any of the parties but it would instead enable this court to gather all the necessary information to arbitrate over the issues in controversy. In the circumstances therefore I grant the plaintiff leave to add Osman Mohamed Haji as a 3rd Defendant. The plaint and the amended chamber summons dated 27. 11. 2002 should be amended within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The Defendants are also given leave to amend and file their amended defences and reply if any within seven (7) days upon service of the amended plaint and the amended chamber summons. The firm of Balala & Company Advocates are directed to assist to serve the amended plaint and the amended chamber summons upon the intended 3rd Defendant.
Costs of this application should be costs in the cause.
Dated at Mombasa this 4rd day of April, 2003.
J.K. SERGON
J U D G E