[2022] KEHC 2032 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's Bill of Costs had been taxed at Ksh.171,635 and a certificate of costs issued. There was no evidence that the respondent had filed a reference to challenge the taxed costs. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the applicant was entitled to entry of judgment in terms of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 2032 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Magatt & Associates Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Co. Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 375 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- motion allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs, interest, and costs of the motion
- Judges
- JK Sergon
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Entry of Judgment, Advocate Client Fees
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Magatt & Associates Advocates
Applicant
Trident Insurance Co. Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Motion for Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to entry of judgment for taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.
- 2 Whether the respondent has challenged the certificate of taxation or filed a reference against it.
- 3 Whether interest and costs should be awarded to the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's Bill of Costs had been taxed at Ksh.171,635 and a certificate of costs issued. There was no evidence that the respondent had filed a reference to challenge the taxed costs. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the applicant was entitled to entry of judgment in terms of the certificate of costs. The court therefore allowed the motion, entering judgment for the applicant for the taxed sum, with interest at court rates from the date of the certificate until payment in full, and awarded costs of the motion to the applicant.
Court Disposition
motion allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs, interest, and costs of the motion
Orders
- Judgment is entered for the applicant against the respondent in the sum of Ksh.171,635 plus interest at court rates from 2nd March 2020 until payment in full.
- The applicant is awarded costs of the motion assessed at Ksh.15,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
MISC. APPLICATION NO. 375 OF 2019
MAGATT & ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES..........................APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
TRIDENT INSURANCE CO. LTD....................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1) The subject matter of this ruling is the motion dated 10th March 2020 taken out by the Magatta & Associates, the applicant herein, seeking to have entry of judgment against Trident Insurance Co. Ltd, the respondent herein, in the sum of kshs.171,635/= being taxed costs in terms of the certificate of taxation dated 2nd March 2020.
2) The applicant further sought for costs and interest at court rates. The applicant filed the affidavit sworn by Owen Magatta in support of the motion. The applicant was granted leave to prosecute the motion exparte when the respondent failed to attend the interpartes hearing and when it also failed to file a response to the motion.
3) I have considered the grounds stated on the motion and the facts deponed in the supporting affidavit. The applicant avers that it was instructed by the respondent to defend it in Nairobi C.M.C.C. no. 3251 of 2013 with a promise to settle its legal fees.
4) The applicant argued that it was forced to file an Advocates Bill of Costs dated 9th May 2019. When the respondent refused to settle the applicant’s legal fees. The Advocates Bill of costs was taxed at ksh.171,635/= which amount the applicant seeks to be entered as a judgment sum.
5) Having considered the grounds put forward plus the facts deponed in the supporting affidavit, it is not in dispute that the applicant’s Bill of Costs was taxed at ksh.171,635/= and a certificate of costs was issued by the Deputy Registrar on 2nd March 2020.
6) There is no evidence to show that the respondent has filed a reference to challenge the taxed costs. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the applicant is entitled to seek for entry of judgment in terms of the amount stated on the certificate of costs.
7) In the end, I find the motion dated 10th March 2020 to be meritorious hence it is allowed. Consequently, judgment is entered for the applicant and against the respondent in the sum of ksh.171,635/= plus interest at court rates from 2nd March 2020 until the date of full payment. The applicant is awarded costs of the motion assessed at ksh.15,000/=.
Dated, Signed and Delivered online via Microsoft Teams at Nairobi this 18th day of February, 2022.
………….…………….
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In the presence of:
……………………………. for the Applicant
……………………………. for the Respondent