[2018] KEELC 4891 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4891 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the targeted illegal structures were their places of residence or that they were internally displaced persons residing in the affected areas. The court held that the respondents acted within their statutory mandate in issuing notices for removal of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4891 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Magdalene Njeri; Applicant: Jane Rose Ruguru; Applicant: Rose Odhiambo; Applicant: Beatrice Kageha; Applicant: Jenipher Apondi; Applicant: Priscilla Wawira; Applicant: Michael Njiru; Applicant: John Mungai Murigu; Applicant: Katiba Institute; Respondent: Moses Nyakiongora; Respondent: National Building Inspectorate and Multi Sectoral Committee on Unsafe Structures; Respondent: Ministry of Transport, Infrastructure, Housing, Urban Development and Public Works; Respondent: The Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 47 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Conservatory Orders
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Right to Housing, Eviction Procedure, Conservatory Orders, Illegal Structures, Administrative Action
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Housing Eviction Procedure Conservatory Orders Illegal Structures Administrative Action

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Magdalene Njeri

Applicant

Jane Rose Ruguru

Applicant

Rose Odhiambo

Applicant

Beatrice Kageha

Applicant

Jenipher Apondi

Applicant

Priscilla Wawira

Applicant

Michael Njiru

Applicant

John Mungai Murigu

Applicant

Katiba Institute

Applicant

Moses Nyakiongora

Respondent

National Building Inspectorate and Multi Sectoral Committee on Unsafe Structures

Respondent

Ministry of Transport, Infrastructure, Housing, Urban Development and Public Works

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the petitioners are entitled to conservatory orders restraining the respondents from demolishing or evicting them from the specified areas.
  2. 2 Whether the notices issued by the respondents for removal of illegal structures were lawful and complied with statutory requirements.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioners demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of conservatory orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the targeted illegal structures were their places of residence or that they were internally displaced persons residing in the affected areas. The court held that the respondents acted within their statutory mandate in issuing notices for removal of illegal structures from public reserves, and that the provisions of Section 152C of the Land Act on eviction procedures did not apply to the removal of unsafe or illegal structures. The petitioners did not establish a prima facie case or show that denial of conservatory orders would result in violation of their constitutional rights. Consequently, the application for conservatory...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The notice of motion dated 30th July 2018 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.