[2018] KESC 26 (KLR)
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Ahmed Ali Muktar, as the running mate of the appellant and Deputy Governor of Wajir County, demonstrated a direct and legitimate interest in the outcome of the petition. The Court found that he would be directly affected by any decision invalidating the election results, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KESC 26 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Hon. Mohamed Abdi Mahamud; Respondent: Ahmed Abdullahi Mohammad; Respondent: Ahmed Muhumed Abdi; Respondent: Gichohi Gatuma Patrick; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Applicant: Ahmed Ali Muktar
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Court Station
- Supreme Court of Kenya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 7 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Petition / Application for Joinder as Interested Party
- Outcome
- Application for joinder as interested party allowed.
- Judges
- DK Maraga, PM Mwilu, MK Ibrahim, JB Ojwang, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu, I Lenaola
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Interested Party Status, Election Petition Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hon. Mohamed Abdi Mahamud
Appellant
Ahmed Abdullahi Mohammad
Respondent
Ahmed Muhumed Abdi
Respondent
Gichohi Gatuma Patrick
Respondent
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Ahmed Ali Muktar
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Petition / Application for Joinder as Interested Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ahmed Ali Muktar should be joined as an interested party in Petition No. 7 of 2018.
- 2 Whether the applicant has a direct and legitimate interest in the petition sufficient to warrant joinder.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Ahmed Ali Muktar, as the running mate of the appellant and Deputy Governor of Wajir County, demonstrated a direct and legitimate interest in the outcome of the petition. The Court found that he would be directly affected by any decision invalidating the election results, and that his participation would be relevant and useful to the proceedings. Applying the principles established in prior Supreme Court decisions, the Court concluded that the applicant met the threshold for joinder as an interested party under Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules. Accordingly, the application for joinder was allowed.
Court Disposition
Application for joinder as interested party allowed.
Orders
- Ahmed Ali Muktar is joined as an interested party in Petition No. 7 of 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
Mahamud v Mohammad & 3 others; Muktar (Intended Interested Party) (Petition 7 of 2018) [2018] KESC 26 (KLR) (28 September 2018) (Ruling)
Mohamed Abdi Mahamud v Ahmed Abdullahi Mohammad & 4 others [2018] eKLR
Neutral citation: [2018] KESC 26 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Supreme Court of Kenya
Petition 7 of 2018
DK Maraga, CJ, PM Mwilu, DCJ & V-P, MK Ibrahim, JB Ojwang, SC Wanjala, NS Ndungu & I Lenaola, SCJJ
September 28, 2018
Between
Hon. Mohamed Abdi Mahamud
Appellant
and
Ahmed Abdullahi Mohammad
1st Respondent
Ahmed Muhumed Abdi
2nd Respondent
Gichohi Gatuma Patrick
3rd Respondent
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
4th Respondent
and
Ahmed Ali Muktar
Intended Interested Party
((An application for joinder as an interested party under Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules))
Ruling
1. Upon perusing the Application dated 7th June, 2018 and filed on 8th June, 2018 by Ahmed Ali Muktar, for joinder as an interested party in Petition No. 7 of 2018 and;
2. Upon reading: the Affidavit of Mr. Ahmed Ali Muktar, the running mate of the Appellant in the election for Governor of Wajir County and the Deputy Governor of the said County, sworn on the 7th June, 2018; and;
3. Upon considering the arguments made for the Applicant in which it is contended that the applicant has direct and legitimate interest in the present petition; he was a running mate of the Appellant in the election for Governor of Wajir County which is the subject of the present petition; he will suffer prejudice if he is not enjoined as a party in the proceedings; the Appellant was nominated and elected with the Interested Party; he shall advance submissions that are relevant and useful to the petition and which will be different from those of the other parties that have a direct bearing on the current proceedings and the ultimate outcome; and, that he will be directly affected by the outcome of this petition; and;
4. Upon considering the Applicant will be prejudiced if not enjoined and that he has an identifiable stake in the matter in line with the criteria laid down in Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemu & 5 Others, Supreme Court Petition No. 12 of 2013, [2015] eKLR and Francis Karioki Muruatetu & another v Republic & 5 others, Supreme Court Petition No. 15 & 16 of 2015 (consolidated); [2016] eKLR
5. Having considered the Application, by a unanimous decision of the Court, we find that the Applicant qualifies to be joined as an interested party and make the following orders under Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules.
6. Orders Reasons
The Application is allowed The application meets the principles laid out inTrusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemu & 5 Others, Supreme Court Petition No. 12 of 2013, [2015] eKLR andFrancis Karioki Muruatetu & another v Republic & 5 others, Supreme Court Petition No. 15 & 16 of 2015 (consolidated); [2016] eKLR in that the applicant having been a running mate to the Appellant and the Deputy Governor, Wajir County, will be directly affected by the outcome of the Petition in the event of invalidation of the declared results.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018. ..............................D. K. MARAGACHIEF JUSTICE & PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................P. M. MWILUDEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE & VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................M.K IBRAHIMJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................J.B. OJWANGJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................S. C. WANJALAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................S. N. NDUNGUJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT..............................I. LENAOLAJUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURTI certify that this is a true copy of the originalREGISTRARSUPREME COURT OF KENYA