[2016] KEELC 888 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 888 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff had produced a valid Title Deed for Ruiru West Block 1/234 and there was no evidence that the title was acquired fraudulently or by mistake. The 1st Defendant failed to provide any evidence of ownership. The law presumes the holder of a Certificate of Title to be the absolute and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 888 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Maina Kariuki; Defendant: John Maina Mburu; Defendant: The Honourable Attorney General; Defendant: Commissioner of Lands
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 136 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit allowed.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Compulsory Acquisition, Title Registration, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Compulsory Acquisition Title Registration Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maina Kariuki

Plaintiff

John Maina Mburu

Defendant

The Honourable Attorney General

Defendant

Commissioner of Lands

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is the rightful and registered owner of parcel Ruiru West Block 1/234.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st Defendant was lawfully gazetted as the beneficiary for compensation for the suit property.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to compensation for compulsory acquisition of the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had produced a valid Title Deed for Ruiru West Block 1/234 and there was no evidence that the title was acquired fraudulently or by mistake. The 1st Defendant failed to provide any evidence of ownership. The law presumes the holder of a Certificate of Title to be the absolute and indefeasible owner unless proven otherwise. The gazettement of the 1st Defendant as the beneficiary for compensation was not supported by evidence of ownership. Therefore, the Plaintiff is the rightful owner and entitled to compensation for compulsory acquisition. The court granted a permanent injunction against the 1st Defendant, declared the Plaintiff as the registered owner,...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's suit allowed.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction restraining the 1st Defendant, his agents, employees and assigns from interfering with the Plaintiff's parcel of land known as Ruiru/West Block 1/234.
  • A declaration that the Plaintiff is the registered owner of parcel of land known as Ruiru West Block 1/234.