[2022] KEHC 11697 (KLR)
The court found that although the judgment in favor of the 8th respondent on the professional undertaking was final, the sum of Kshs. 102,378,022.98 had been ring-fenced by agreement between the applicant and the 1st to 6th respondents pending resolution of disputes under the SPA. The court held that it would be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 11697 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Samuel Thenya Maina; Respondent: Brian Martin Francis; Respondent: Estate of Hiram Ngaruiya; Respondent: Isaac Njoroge Gitoho; Respondent: James Njuguna Gitoho; Respondent: Krisco Holdings Limited; Respondent: Muiboro Enterprises Limited; Respondent: KCB Bank Kenya Limited; Respondent: Bilha W. Mwangi & Kemboy Julius Kipkosgey t/a Kemboy Law Advocates LLP; Respondent: Njeri Benson Ngugi; Respondent: Igeria Arthur Konye; Respondent: Njoroge David Ngumbu T/A Igeria & Ngugi Advocates
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2022
- Case Number
- Civil Suit E112 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction Pending Arbitration
- Outcome
- Application for injunction dismissed; orders granted for deposit of funds in joint account.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Interim Measures, Professional Undertakings, Share Purchase Agreements, Ring Fencing of Funds
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Thenya Maina
Applicant
Brian Martin Francis
Respondent
Estate of Hiram Ngaruiya
Respondent
Isaac Njoroge Gitoho
Respondent
James Njuguna Gitoho
Respondent
Krisco Holdings Limited
Respondent
Muiboro Enterprises Limited
Respondent
KCB Bank Kenya Limited
Respondent
Bilha W. Mwangi & Kemboy Julius Kipkosgey t/a Kemboy Law Advocates LLP
Respondent
Njeri Benson Ngugi
Respondent
Igeria Arthur Konye
Respondent
Njoroge David Ngumbu T/A Igeria & Ngugi Advocates
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction Pending Arbitration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant an injunction restraining payment of Kshs. 102,378,022.98 to the 8th respondent pending arbitration.
- 2 Whether the sum of Kshs. 102,378,022.98 is subject to preservation under section 7 of the Arbitration Act.
- 3 Whether the interests of the applicant would be rendered nugatory if the funds are released before conclusion of arbitration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the judgment in favor of the 8th respondent on the professional undertaking was final, the sum of Kshs. 102,378,022.98 had been ring-fenced by agreement between the applicant and the 1st to 6th respondents pending resolution of disputes under the SPA. The court held that it would be inequitable to allow the release of the funds to the 1st to 6th respondents before conclusion of the arbitration, as their whereabouts and asset base were unknown and recovery would be difficult if the applicant succeeded. The court determined that the justice of the case required the funds to be held by the advocates for the disputants, thereby protecting the applicant's...
Court Disposition
Application for injunction dismissed; orders granted for deposit of funds in joint account.
Orders
- Prayer no.3 of the Summons dated 26/2/2021 is dismissed.
- Prayer nos. 4 and 5 of the Summons dated 26/2/2021 are granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment