[2025] KEHC 70 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 70 (KLR)

The judge determined that, for personal reasons, he could not continue to preside over the matter. To avoid any perception of bias or conflict of interest, and in accordance with the principles of judicial impartiality, he recused himself and referred the matter to the Presiding Judge of the Division for further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 70 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Dr Samuel Nthenya Maina; Respondent: Brian Martin Francis; Respondent: The Estate of the Late Hiram Ngaruiya; Respondent: Isaac Njoroge Gitoho; Respondent: James Njuguna Gitoho; Respondent: Krisco Holdings Limited; Respondent: Muiboro Enterprises Limited; Respondent: KCB Bank Kenya Limited; Respondent: Bilha W Mwangi & Kemboi Julius Kopkosgei t/a Kemboi Law LLP; Respondent: Njeri Benson Ngugi; Respondent: Igeria Arthur Konye; Respondent: Njoroge David Ngumbu t/a Igeria & Ngugi Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit E112 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Directions
Outcome
Judge recused himself; matter referred to Presiding Judge for further directions.
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Judicial Recusal, Case Management
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Judicial Recusal Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Samuel Nthenya Maina

Applicant

Brian Martin Francis

Respondent

The Estate of the Late Hiram Ngaruiya

Respondent

Isaac Njoroge Gitoho

Respondent

James Njuguna Gitoho

Respondent

Krisco Holdings Limited

Respondent

Muiboro Enterprises Limited

Respondent

KCB Bank Kenya Limited

Respondent

Bilha W Mwangi & Kemboi Julius Kopkosgei t/a Kemboi Law LLP

Respondent

Njeri Benson Ngugi

Respondent

Igeria Arthur Konye

Respondent

Njoroge David Ngumbu t/a Igeria & Ngugi Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the presiding judge should recuse himself from hearing the matter.

Ratio Decidendi

The judge determined that, for personal reasons, he could not continue to preside over the matter. To avoid any perception of bias or conflict of interest, and in accordance with the principles of judicial impartiality, he recused himself and referred the matter to the Presiding Judge of the Division for further directions. No substantive issues of law or fact were addressed, and no arguments were entertained from the parties.

Court Disposition

Judge recused himself; matter referred to Presiding Judge for further directions.

Orders

  • The judge recuses himself from the matter.
  • The file is referred to the Presiding Judge of the Division for further directions.