[2023] KEELC 17527 (KLR)
The court held that a witness who was not present at the meeting and did not sign the minutes is not competent to produce the minutes as evidence. The rationale is that only a person with direct knowledge of the meeting or who can answer questions about the document's authenticity and contents is qualified to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 17527 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Veronica Wanjiku Maina; Defendant: Hezekiah Ithagu Mwangi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 231 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Documentary Evidence
- Outcome
- Objection to production of minutes by absent witness upheld.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Documentary Evidence, Witness Competence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Veronica Wanjiku Maina
Plaintiff
Hezekiah Ithagu Mwangi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Admissibility of Documentary Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a witness who was absent from a meeting is competent to produce the minutes of that meeting as evidence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a witness who was not present at the meeting and did not sign the minutes is not competent to produce the minutes as evidence. The rationale is that only a person with direct knowledge of the meeting or who can answer questions about the document's authenticity and contents is qualified to introduce such evidence. The objection to the production of the minutes by the absent witness was therefore upheld.
Court Disposition
Objection to production of minutes by absent witness upheld.
Orders
- The objection by Ms Njoroge is upheld. The witness is not permitted to produce the minutes of the meeting of May 12, 1993.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
Maina v Mwangi (Environment & Land Case 231 of 2012) [2023] KEELC 17527 (KLR) (17 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 17527 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
Environment & Land Case 231 of 2012
FM Njoroge, J
May 17, 2023
Between
Veronica Wanjiku Maina
Plaintiff
and
Hezekiah Ithagu Mwangi
Defendant
Ruling
1. I think that the witness in the stand has not laid any background that would have entitle him to produce the minutes of the meeting of May 12, 1993 at which he admittedly was absent. Only a person who was present at that meeting or who signed the minutes and who could answer matters relating to that document is competent to produce that document. I uphold Ms Njoroge’s objection.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU IN OPEN COURT ON THIS 17TH DAY OF MAY, 2023. MWANGI NJOROGEJUDGE, ELC NAKURU