[2024] KEELC 3567 (KLR)
The court found that if a stay of execution is not granted, the appellant may be evicted from the disputed land, which would render the appeal nugatory. The court was persuaded that the interests of justice require preservation of the status quo regarding possession and title of the land pending the hearing and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 3567 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mary Kerubo Mainye; Respondent: Pauline Kwamboka Nyagaka
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Appeal / Stay Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application for stay of execution allowed
- Judges
- M Sila
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Ex Parte Judgment, Eviction Orders, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Kerubo Mainye
Appellant
Pauline Kwamboka Nyagaka
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Stay Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
- 2 Whether execution of the judgment would render the appeal nugatory.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that if a stay of execution is not granted, the appellant may be evicted from the disputed land, which would render the appeal nugatory. The court was persuaded that the interests of justice require preservation of the status quo regarding possession and title of the land pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Accordingly, the court allowed the application for stay of execution and ordered that the execution of the judgment be stayed, with the status quo maintained.
Court Disposition
application for stay of execution allowed
Orders
- Execution of the judgment delivered on 29 August 2023 is stayed pending hearing and determination of this appeal.
- Status quo regarding possession and title of the disputed land parcel West Kitutu/Bomatara/1413 to be maintained pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mainye v Nyagaka (Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3567 (KLR) (9 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 3567 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Environment and Land Appeal E021 of 2023
M Sila, J
April 9, 2024
Between
Mary Kerubo Mainye
Appellant
and
Pauline Kwamboka Nyagaka
Respondent
Ruling
1. The application before me is that dated 21 December 2023 filed by the appellant. He seeks an order of stay of execution of the judgment delivered by the Magistrates’ Court Kisii, in the case Kisii CMCCELC No.126 of 2020, pending hearing and determination of this appeal.
2. From what I can see, the respondent was the plaintiff before the suit in the subordinate court with the applicant as defendant. The matter proceeded for hearing ex parte on 8 August 2023 and judgment was reserved for delivery on 29 August 2023. Before the judgment was delivered, the applicant filed an application dated 14 August 2023 seeking to set aside the ex parte proceedings. However, by the time the application was heard, the judgment that was scheduled for 29 August 2023 was already delivered. In her ruling on the application dated 14 August 2023, the trial Magistrate held that since judgment had already been delivered, there was nothing left in it and proceeded to dismiss the application. Aggrieved, the applicant filed this appeal to contest the dismissal of her application and now seeks stay of execution of the judgment pending hearing of the appeal.
3. On 27 February 2024 when the application came before me, Mr. Ayora, learned counsel for the respondent, stated that he had filed a reply. I couldn’t see any in the file and I directed counsel to present a copy for the court file. I have seen none. Nevertheless I have seen the submissions of Mr. Ayora where he has inter alia argued that the application sought orders that were overtaken and that it is moot. He also submitted that the judgment is not subject to an appeal. I think these are issues that can be canvassed in the main appeal herein.
4. I am persuaded that if I do not grant an order of stay of execution pending appeal, the judgment may be executed, and the appeal may be rendered nugatory. This is in light of the fact that the respondent had sued the appellant for trespass over the land parcel West Kitutu/Bomatara/1413 and if the judgment is executed the applicant stands to be evicted which may render the appeal nugatory.
5. I will therefore allow the application dated 4 December 2023. I order that execution of the judgment delivered on 29 August 2024 be stayed pending hearing and determination of this appeal. I further direct that the status quo regarding possession and title of the disputed land be maintained pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
6. The costs of the application will be costs in the appeal.
7. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 9 DAY OF APRIL 2024JUSTICE MUNYAO SILAJUDGE, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURTAT KISIIDelivered in the presence of :Mr. GJM Masese for the applicant – AbsentMr. Ayora for the respondent – AbsentCourt Assistant – Aphline OwiwaPage 2 of 2