[2023] KEELC 19146 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated ownership of the suit property and that there was no evidence from the defendants to justify the threatened demolition. The absence of opposition to the application and the risk of irreparable loss to the plaintiff if the demolition proceeded persuaded the court to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 19146 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Teresa Nyansiaboka Maisiba; Defendant: Municipal Council Of Ogembo; Defendant: Kisii County Government; Defendant: James Ondari
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit E009 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- interlocutory injunction granted
- Judges
- M Sila
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Land Ownership, Trespass, Demolition Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresa Nyansiaboka Maisiba
Plaintiff
Municipal Council Of Ogembo
Defendant
Kisii County Government
Defendant
James Ondari
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants from demolishing the building on the suit land pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated ownership and risk of irreparable harm.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated ownership of the suit property and that there was no evidence from the defendants to justify the threatened demolition. The absence of opposition to the application and the risk of irreparable loss to the plaintiff if the demolition proceeded persuaded the court to grant an interlocutory injunction. The court applied the principles for granting injunctions, noting that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and the risk of irreparable harm. Accordingly, the court issued an order restraining the defendants from entering the suit land to demolish the structure or demolishing any structures on the suit land pending hearing and...
Court Disposition
interlocutory injunction granted
Orders
- The defendants are restrained from entering the suit land to demolish the structure therein or demolishing any structures on the suit land pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- Costs of the application shall be costs in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Maisiba v Municipal Council of Ogembo & 2 others (Civil Suit E009 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 19146 (KLR) (26 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 19146 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisii
Civil Suit E009 of 2023
M Sila, J
July 26, 2023
Between
Teresa Nyansiaboka Maisiba
Plaintiff
and
Municipal Council Of Ogembo
1st Defendant
Kisii County Government
2nd Defendant
James Ondari
3rd Defendant
Ruling
1. The plaintiff filed suit on 21 June 2023 where she averred to be the registered proprietor of the land parcel Majoge/Boochi/3638 (the suit land). She pleaded that the property is developed and that on it is a commercial shopping complex comprising of 12 units on the ground floor with tenants and that its estimated value is Kshs 26,000,000/=. She pleaded that this development was approved on 3 September 2020. She complains that despite the above, the 1st defendant, the Municipal Council of Ogembo, has issued verbal warnings that they will demolish the building and that the 3rd defendant, who is Member of County Assembly (MCA) of the area, has also made similar threats. In the suit, the plaintiff seeks orders to permanently restrain the defendants from demolishing the building on her property.
2. Together with the plaint, the plaintiff filed an application for injunction, seeking to have the defendants restrained from entering, trespassing, or otherwise interfering with her quiet possession of the suit land pending hearing of this case. She annexed a search of the property to demonstrate that she owns it.
3. Nothing was filed to oppose the motion and I have given it due consideration.
4. The plaintiff has demonstrated that she owns the suit property. She has stated that she has developed it with a commercial building. I have not seen the building plans, but I will take it that the building is developed, there being nothing to suggest otherwise. It is not clear to me why the defendants would wish to demolish the property and they have not filed anything to justify that action. I am persuaded that if the defendants proceed with the intended demolition, the plaintiff stands to suffer irreparable loss. In essence, from the material before me, I am persuaded to issue an order of injunction, stopping the defendants from entering the suit land to demolish the structure therein, or demolishing any structures on the suit land, pending hearing and determination of this suit. The costs of the application will be costs in the cause.
5. Orders accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISII THIS 26 DAY OF JULY 2023JUSTICE MUNYAO SILAJUDGE, ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURTAT KISII