[2023] KECPT 798 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 798 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had provided uncontroverted documentary evidence of payment for shares, allotment of the subject plots, and transfer of shares from a previous member with the society's consent. The respondents, despite being served, failed to enter appearance or contest the claim. The Tribunal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 798 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Alexander Steppen Maithya; Respondent: Riakanau Cooperative Society Limited; Respondent: Esther Waiyua Kisoa; Respondent: J.K. Njamongo and Company Advocates
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 187 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim partly allowed
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Title Deeds Release, Share Transfer in Cooperative, Breach of Contract, Allotment of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Title Deeds Release Share Transfer in Cooperative Breach of Contract Allotment of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Steppen Maithya

Applicant

Riakanau Cooperative Society Limited

Respondent

Esther Waiyua Kisoa

Respondent

J.K. Njamongo and Company Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to the release of title deeds for plots 20885/11 and 20885/43.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents unlawfully withheld the title deeds despite full payment and allotment.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to special and general damages for breach of contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had provided uncontroverted documentary evidence of payment for shares, allotment of the subject plots, and transfer of shares from a previous member with the society's consent. The respondents, despite being served, failed to enter appearance or contest the claim. The Tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence as sufficient proof of entitlement to the title deeds for plots 20885/11 and 20885/43. The Tribunal held that the respondents' continued withholding of the title deeds was unlawful. However, the claims for special and general damages were dismissed for lack of supporting evidence. The Tribunal ordered the respondents to process and release the...

Court Disposition

claim partly allowed

Orders

  • The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th respondents are ordered to process and release title deeds for plot numbers 20885/11 and 20885/43 registered in the name of Alexander Stephen Maithya within 60 days from the date of judgment.
  • Claims for special and general damages are dismissed for lack of supporting evidence.