[2020] KEELC 1344 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the grant of interim orders to preserve the subject matter of the suit pending determination of the application and the main suit. However, in view of the 1st respondent's admitted occupation of part of the suit land, the court varied the interim orders to allow her continued occupation of her portion. The court also directed that the preliminary objection raised by the respondents be heard first, with timelines for filing and serving submissions, and granted parties leave to file further responses as necessary. The orders sought to balance the interests of both parties and maintain the status quo until the...
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 1344 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Majani Estates Limited; Defendant: Muthoni Nkonge; Defendant: Muriuki Ndubi; Defendant: Saulu Ndiga; Defendant: Kariba Kanampiu; Defendant: Mwirigi Miriti; Defendant: Mugendi Kainyati; Defendant: Paul Kinyua Riungu; Defendant: Mwiti Riungu; Defendant: Benedictine Njiru Riungu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2020
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 8 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling on Injunction and Preliminary Objection Directions
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted with variation; directions issued for hearing of preliminary objection.
- Legal Topics
- Temporary Injunctions, Land Ownership Disputes, Interlocutory Orders, Preliminary Objection Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Majani Estates Limited
Plaintiff
Muthoni Nkonge
Defendant
Muriuki Ndubi
Defendant
Saulu Ndiga
Defendant
Kariba Kanampiu
Defendant
Mwirigi Miriti
Defendant
Mugendi Kainyati
Defendant
Paul Kinyua Riungu
Defendant
Mwiti Riungu
Defendant
Benedictine Njiru Riungu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application Ruling on Injunction and Preliminary Objection Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with LR NO. MWIMBI/CHOGORIA/5951, 5952 and 5953 pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the court should vary interim orders to allow the 1st respondent to remain on the portion she occupies.
- 3 Whether directions should be given for hearing of the preliminary objection.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the grant of interim orders to preserve the subject matter of the suit pending determination of the application and the main suit. However, in view of the 1st respondent's admitted occupation of part of the suit land, the court varied the interim orders to allow her continued occupation of her portion. The court also directed that the preliminary objection raised by the respondents be heard first, with timelines for filing and serving submissions, and granted parties leave to file further responses as necessary. The orders sought to balance the interests of both parties and maintain the status quo until the...
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted with variation; directions issued for hearing of preliminary objection.
Orders
- Interim orders extended in terms of section 63 of the Civil Procedure Act.
- Preliminary objection dated 10th September, 2020 to be heard first; proponents to file and serve submissions within 7 days; plaintiff to respond within 7 days of receipt.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment