[2023] KEELRC 1359 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1359 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent company was dissolved after judgment and during execution proceedings, and that the directors and shareholders acted with the intention of frustrating the claimant's ability to realize the fruits of the judgment. The court held that this conduct justified piercing the corporate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1359 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jonathan Mulewa Makae; Respondent: Habo Group of Companies
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 179 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Lifting the Corporate Veil and Execution Against Directors
Outcome
application allowed; corporate veil lifted; directors and shareholders held personally liable for decretal sum; costs to claimant
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Lifting Corporate Veil, Director Liability, Fraudulent Dissolution, Judgment Execution, Employment Debt
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Commercial and Corporate Lifting Corporate Veil Director Liability Fraudulent Dissolution Judgment Execution Employment Debt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jonathan Mulewa Makae

Applicant

Habo Group of Companies

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Lifting the Corporate Veil and Execution Against Directors

  1. 1 Whether the court should lift the corporate veil of the respondent company and hold its directors and shareholders personally liable for the decretal sum.
  2. 2 Whether the directors and shareholders of the respondent acted fraudulently in dissolving the company to frustrate execution of the judgment.
  3. 3 Whether warrants of attachment and other execution processes can issue against the directors and shareholders personally.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent company was dissolved after judgment and during execution proceedings, and that the directors and shareholders acted with the intention of frustrating the claimant's ability to realize the fruits of the judgment. The court held that this conduct justified piercing the corporate veil and imposing personal liability on the directors and shareholders for the decretal sum. The court ordered that warrants of attachment and sale of their property, or any other lawful execution process, may issue against them to satisfy the judgment. Costs of the application were awarded to the claimant.

Court Disposition

application allowed; corporate veil lifted; directors and shareholders held personally liable for decretal sum; costs to claimant

Orders

  • The veil of incorporation of the respondent company is lifted.
  • Personal liability for the decretal sum is imposed on Mr Augustine Omondi Awiti, Mr Hezron Awiti Bollo, Ms Monica Anyango Awiti, Mamba Village Centre Limited, Silver Dust Limited and Habo Agencies Limited.