[2025] KECA 918 (KLR)
The Court found that the respondent had failed to file the record of appeal within the prescribed time, despite being supplied with the necessary proceedings. The respondent did not contest the facts or appear at the hearing, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. The Court held that, in accordance...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 918 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenneth Maina Makeri & 4 others; Respondent: John Edward Njeru & 5 others
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) E084 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to the applicant
- Judges
- MA Warsame, JM Mativo, PM Gachoka
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Notice of Appeal, Failure to File Record of Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules, Timeliness of Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Maina Makeri & 4 others
Applicant
John Edward Njeru & 5 others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Application / Application to Strike Out Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice of appeal should be struck out for failure to file the record of appeal within the prescribed time.
- 2 Whether the respondent has demonstrated any interest or steps taken to prosecute the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the respondent had failed to file the record of appeal within the prescribed time, despite being supplied with the necessary proceedings. The respondent did not contest the facts or appear at the hearing, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal. The Court held that, in accordance with Rule 85 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the notice of appeal should be deemed withdrawn and struck out, as the procedural requirements for instituting the appeal were not met and no justification for the delay was provided.
Court Disposition
application allowed; notice of appeal struck out with costs to the applicant
Orders
- The notice of appeal dated 2nd December 2019 is struck out.
- Costs awarded to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Makeri & 4 others v Njeru & 5 others (Civil Appeal (Application) E084 of 2023) [2025] KECA 918 (KLR) (26 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 918 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Civil Appeal (Application) E084 of 2023
MA Warsame, JM Mativo & PM Gachoka, JJA
May 26, 2025
Between
Kenneth Maina Makeri & 4 others
Applicant
and
John Edward Njeru & 5 others
Respondent
(An application to strike a notice of appeal from the judgment and decree of the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru (M. Sila, J.) delivered on 27th November 2019 in ELC Case No. 228 of 2018 Formerly Nakuru HCCC No. 260 of 1999))
Ruling
1. By a notice of motion dated 7th July 2023, under rules 77, 84 & 85 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2022, the applicant is seeking to strike out a notice of appeal dated 2nd December 2019 for the respondents’ failure to adhere to the set down procedures and timelines as follows:(2)That this Honourable Court be pleased to deem the notice of appeal dated 2nd December, 2019 and lodged on 11th December, 2019 as withdrawn for failure to adhere to the set down procedures and timelines for the institution of an appeal and the failure to file a record of appeal to date, being approximately three (3) years after filing the notice of appeal.
2. The application is supported by the supporting affidavit of Kahiga Waitindi, Advocate for the applicants. The respondent has not filed any response. When the application was called out for hearing Mr. Karanja, learned counsel was present for the applicant and there was no appearance by the respondent, though duly served.
3. We have considered the application and the submissions by the applicant. We note the notice of appeal was filed 2nd December 2019 and the typed proceedings were supplied to the respondent on 10th February 2020. These facts have not been controverted by the respondent. Therefore, it is clear that the respondent has failed to file the record of appeal within time and has not shown any interest in pursuing the same. Therefore, it is clear that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal and the applicant is justified, rightly so, in prosecuting the appeal before us.
4. This is a proper case in which the notice of appeal should be deemed as withdrawn in accordance with Rule 85 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
5. Accordingly, the notice of appeal is hereby struck out with cost to the applicant.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2025. M. WARSAME.............................JUDGE OF APPEALJ. MATIVO.............................JUDGE OF APPEALM. GACHOKA C.Arb, FCIArb.............................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.signed.DEPUTY REGISTRAR.