[2023] KEHC 21887 (KLR)
The court found that the instruction fee of KES 150,000 awarded by the taxing master was on the lower side, given the factors considered, including the nature and importance of the matter, the complexity of the issues, and the work done by the advocate. The judge exercised discretion to increase the instruction fee...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 21887 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Makhecha & Gitonga Advocates; Respondent: The Standard Group Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application E534 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Reference Against Taxation of Bill of Costs
- Outcome
- reference allowed; instruction fee increased; judgment entered for applicant
- Judges
- AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Instruction Fee, Reference Against Taxation, Assessment of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Makhecha & Gitonga Advocates
Applicant
The Standard Group Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Reference Against Taxation of Bill of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the instruction fee awarded by the taxing master was inordinately low as to cause injustice to the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the instruction fee of KES 150,000 awarded by the taxing master was on the lower side, given the factors considered, including the nature and importance of the matter, the complexity of the issues, and the work done by the advocate. The judge exercised discretion to increase the instruction fee to KES 300,000, resulting in a total payable sum of KES 643,186, inclusive of VAT and disbursements, less amounts already paid. The court held that the taxing master had failed to properly apply the relevant principles, and the award was manifestly low, justifying the court's intervention.
Court Disposition
reference allowed; instruction fee increased; judgment entered for applicant
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the advocate against the client for KES 643,186 plus interest at 14% from the date of taxation until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Makhecha & Gitonga Advocates v Standard Group Limited (Civil Miscellaneous Application E534 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 21887 (KLR) (Civ) (14 August 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 21887 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Civil Miscellaneous Application E534 of 2021
AN Ongeri, J
August 14, 2023
Between
Makhecha & Gitonga Advocates
Applicant
and
The Standard Group Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. The advocate filed a reference dated May 9, 2022 in the bill of costs taxed on April 28, 2022 contesting on the instruction fee on the grounds that the taxing master failed to apply the correct principles and awarded costs that were manifestly low as to cause the injustice to the applicant.
2. The reference is supported by the applicants supporting affidavit sworn on May 9, 2022.
3. The applicant filed written submissions which I have duly considered.
4. The sole issue for determination is whether the instructions fees was inordinately low.
5. The taxing master stated that the value of the subject matter was not ascertainable from the pleadings and she considered the following factorsa.The nature and importance of the cause or matter.b.The amount or value of the subject matter.c.The interest of the parties.d.The general conduct of the parties.e.The complexity of the issues raised and novel points of law.f.The time, research and skill expended in the brief.g.The brief of documents involved.
6. The taxing officer also relied on the cases of Premchan Raichand Ltd & Another vs Quarry Services Of Ea Ltd & Others(1972) EA & R vs Minster Of Agriculture & 2 Others Exparte Samuel Muchiri Njuguna & 6 Others (2006) e KLR.
7. The taxing officer award ksh 150,000 in respect of instruction fees and taxed off ksh 550,000.
8. I find ksh 150,000 on the lower side. I award ksh 300,000 as instruction fees.
9. The total award is 393,375 plus ½ (196,687) = 590,062. 50Add 16% VAT ( 94,409. 92)Total 684,471Add disbursement ( 3,715)Total 688,186Less paid ( 45,000)Total payable 643,186
10. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of the advocate against the clients in e sum of ksh 643,186 plus interest at 14% from the date of taxation until payment in full.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ONLINE VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023. ……………………….A. N. ONGERIJUDGE