[2003] KECA 143 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that both the trial and first appellate courts properly evaluated the evidence, finding the complainant's testimony credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The appellant's conviction was supported by overwhelming evidence, and no point of law arose for determination on second appeal....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] KECA 143 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Makio Musya; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 216 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; conviction upheld
- Judges
- E Owuor, D Ole Keiwua
- Legal Topics
- Unnatural Offences, Sexual Offences Against Children, Standard of Proof, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Makio Musya
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for unnatural offence was supported by credible and sufficient evidence.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was lawful and appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that both the trial and first appellate courts properly evaluated the evidence, finding the complainant's testimony credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The appellant's conviction was supported by overwhelming evidence, and no point of law arose for determination on second appeal. The court held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, and there was no merit in the appeal. The conviction was therefore upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; conviction upheld
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT MOMBASA (CORAM: TUNOI, OWUOR & KEIWUA, JJ.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 216 OF 2002
BETWEEN
MAKIO MUSYA ..........................................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the judgment of the high Court of Kenya at Mombasa (Khaminwa, Comm. of Assize) dated 3rd October, 2001
in H.C.Cr. Appeal No. 128 of 2000) *****************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
The appellant, Makio Musya, was convicted of unnatural offence contrary to section 162(a) of the Penal Code and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment plus 8 strokes of the cane. His first appeal to the High Court of Kenya at Mombasa upheld the conviction but reduced the sentence to 8 years imprisonment. This is therefore a second appeal.
The appellant was employed by the family of the complainant as a houseboy. On the material day F.H (PW2), the mother of the complainant, was at home and she observed that the complainant who was aged 11 years at the time was walking with a lot of difficulty. She called him and asked him about it. The complainant, though slightly mentally retarded, narrated to her in detail how the appellant had sodomised him on more than five occasions between May, 1999 and 25th November, 1999.
A medical examination carried out on the complainant by Dr. Michael Mwita of the Coast General Hospital revealed that the muscles of the anal region had been significantly weakened and could freely open as the complainant bent. This was due to repeated unnatural acts of sodomy.
The two courts below believed the evidence of the complainant and held that the prosecution had proved its case against the appellant beyond all reasonable doubt.
This being a second appeal no point of law arose for our determination. The evidence on record established beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant did indeed commit the offence with which he was charged. Moreover, the testimony of the complainant was credible and consistent and was lent corroboration by the medical report compiled by Dr. Mwita.
So, in our view, the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming. The conviction is upheld.
We find no merit in this appeal and we order that it be dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 24th day of January, 2003.
P.K. TUNOI
...............
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E. OWUOR
...............
JUDGE OF APPEAL
M. Ole KEIWUA
...............
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR