[2022] KEHC 11201 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11201 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had only served ten months and one day of his custodial sentence, which was insufficient to justify a review or conversion of the sentence to community service as recommended by the probation officer. The court was not persuaded that the circumstances warranted interference with...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11201 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Godfrey Makokha; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E040 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application for revision rejected
Judges
JN Kamau
Legal Topics
Malicious Damage to Property, Creating Disturbance, Assault on Police Officer, Sentencing Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Malicious Damage to Property Creating Disturbance Assault on Police Officer Sentencing Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Makokha

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of his sentence after serving ten months and one day in prison.
  2. 2 Whether the recommendation for community service should be adopted at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had only served ten months and one day of his custodial sentence, which was insufficient to justify a review or conversion of the sentence to community service as recommended by the probation officer. The court was not persuaded that the circumstances warranted interference with the original sentence at this stage. The application for revision was therefore rejected, but the applicant was granted liberty to file a fresh application at an appropriate time.

Court Disposition

application for revision rejected

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is rejected.
  • The applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application at the appropriate time.