[2022] KEHC 11120 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11120 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment in default of paying a fine of Ksh 50,000/-, whereas the law under section 28(7) of the Penal Code limits default imprisonment for such a fine to a maximum of six months. The sentence imposed was therefore illegal and unlawful. However,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11120 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Everline Makoki; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E020 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Application allowed to the extent of declaration of illegality of sentence; release ordered if applicant still in custody.
Judges
JN Kamau
Legal Topics
Sentencing Illegality, Alcoholic Drinks Control, Default Imprisonment, Statutory Interpretation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Illegality Alcoholic Drinks Control Default Imprisonment Statutory Interpretation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Everline Makoki

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant exceeded the statutory maximum for default imprisonment for the offence charged.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to release if still in custody after serving an unlawful sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment in default of paying a fine of Ksh 50,000/-, whereas the law under section 28(7) of the Penal Code limits default imprisonment for such a fine to a maximum of six months. The sentence imposed was therefore illegal and unlawful. However, since the applicant had already completed the sentence, the court could not review or alter the sentence. The court directed that if the applicant was still in custody, she should be released unless held for any other lawful cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed to the extent of declaration of illegality of sentence; release ordered if applicant still in custody.

Orders

  • If the applicant is still in custody, she shall be released from prison unless held for any other lawful cause.