[2025] KECPT 336 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 336 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that while the claimant was entitled to a refund upon withdrawal as a member of the respondent sacco, she failed to provide the necessary documentary evidence (specifically, her payslip) to substantiate her claim for the refund amount. The respondent's defense based on AGM resolutions and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 336 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Abigael Mwende Malelu; Respondent: Metropolitan Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 551.E687 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed with costs to the respondent
Judges
Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies, Member Withdrawal, Refund of Shares
Source Language
english
Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Member Withdrawal Refund of Shares

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abigael Mwende Malelu

Applicant

Metropolitan Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a refund of Kshs 269,061 upon withdrawal from the respondent sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's AGM resolution suspending refunds is a valid defense against the claim.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's financial difficulties justify withholding the claimant's refund.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that while the claimant was entitled to a refund upon withdrawal as a member of the respondent sacco, she failed to provide the necessary documentary evidence (specifically, her payslip) to substantiate her claim for the refund amount. The respondent's defense based on AGM resolutions and financial difficulties was not sufficient to deny the claim outright, as the society was neither in liquidation nor under statutory management. However, the absence of the claimant's supporting documentation was fatal to her case. Consequently, the claim was dismissed, with costs awarded to the respondent.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The claimant's claim is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.